About Me

Name: Cary Wesberry
Email: carywesberry@sbcglobal.net Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Problems With the Red Queen


Many Republicans were cheered by Hillary Clinton’s victories this past Tuesday. Rush Limbaugh had even recommended that Republicans cross parties and vote for her. And this may have played a critical role in Hillary’s campaign saving victories. Even though these developments have made for strange bedfellow, this should not distract from the liberal policies Hillary’s campaign is based on. She may be preferable to Obama but she is dangerous for America.

Hillary is a committed leftist who believes in the almost unlimited power of government to solve complex economic and social problems. We should not forget that this “government knows best” approach would have disastrous consequences for our economy and way of life.
Hillary’s plan is a draconian government solution that warps the market and punishes those who have been responsible in the name of saving unknown victims. Irresponsible borrowers are bailed out right along with those who might have been taken advantage of by unscrupulous lenders. Her disastrous proposal thus would damage the housing market, place a drag on the economy, and send the wrong signals to homeowners and potential homebuyers.

In Hillary’s worldview, however, citizens are always helpless victims rather than participants in the market. Government is the solution, not the problem. This pattern plays out in her approach to energy policy as well. Hillary proposes to “take back” the profits from energy companies by closing tax “loopholes” and “invest” it in government research. She claims this will result in the creation of thousands of “green collar jobs.”

 
 
Who is this guy?  A closet Obama supporter?  Here's an idea: tell me something about Hillary that I don't know.  It's like a column from Dick Morris for crying out loud.  If you want to write a hit-piece, write one about the real threat.  B. Hussein Obama makes Hillary Clinton look like Bill Kristol.  If Barack was the easy one to beat, Rush and others wouldn't have been advising their listeners to cross-over to Hillary's camp for the primary last Tuesday.  The millions of ignorant masses cling to Obama as if he's the latest cost-cutting infomercial selling you that one piece of junk you don't already have in one form or another.  Hillary needs to knock him down and out now while she has some momentum.  She needs to bribe those super delegates until she's bankrupt, for the sake of the country. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Obama vs. Jim Jones" by Jack Engelhard

Is it time to start worrying? Every time I see those worshipful crowds swooning over Barack Obama one word comes to mind – cult.

Two words, really: Jim Jones.

Before anyone starts accusing me of taking sides, listen: Obama, if elected, may well turn out to be the greatest president we've ever had. Trouble is, we know nothing about him – at least I don't. I've done the usual searches but the information keeps shifting. At the moment he's mostly rumor and he is everything to everybody.

The e-mail messages coming to me prove him to be both patriotic and disloyal, depending on which one I read first. One minute he's a Muslim, next minute he's a Christian. Here he is pro-Israel and there he is anti-Semitic. Shouldn't we know as much about a man running for president as we do about a shortstop trying out for the Boston Red Sox?

I know more about the horses running for the Kentucky Derby than I do about this man running for the presidency.

We know about Obama's skills as an orator. His speeches sound more like sermons and there's nothing wrong with that if he were running for Savior rather than president. But this is not about Obama and it is not Obama I'm worried about (at the moment) but I am getting spooked by those multitudes who are glazing over in religious euphoria.

When he speaks there is laughing, weeping, cheering, fainting and baying at the moon.

That DOES take us back to Jim Jones who promised "heaven on earth." Sound familiar? Jones started his own religion – where he was his own god – and people in search of a new spirituality left their homes and their families to follow him from California to Guyana where he set up The People's Temple.

Jim Jones WAS the Temple and the people prayed to him as if he was Christ – he insisted upon this.

Who are these people that are so easily duped?
 
 
I have an answer for that question.  They're stupid.  Ignorant at best.  Of course it's a cult!  Personally, I'm surprised we haven't had a mass kool-aid attack in a church somewhere hoping to give B. Hussein Obama more spiritual energy by mass suicide.  The vast majority of Obama supporters are made up of uneducated socialist-leaning "students" and the "financially challenged" who believe working for what you need and want is simply too hard.  Instead of looking to themselves they look to an empty-suit like Obama to rain down money from the sky, all the time doing their best to ignore the fact that money comes from you and me and everyone else who works for a living.  If I wanted to throw money away I would give it to the guy standing on the street corner instead of yelling at him to put down the bottle and get a job!  Just like every other cult, the Cult of Obama is trying to fill the big fat hole inside them by praying to something in this world instead of the next.  The Lord helps those who help themselves, not those who help B. Hussein Obama.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"What Every American Needs to Know about the Qur’an" Part V by William J. Federer

 
MOHAMMED’S FIRST CONVERTS

By the earliest account, written 150 years after his death, Mohammed’s first converts were his aging wife Khadijah, his slave and temporarily adopted son Zayd ibn Harithah, his daughter Fatima, his 10-year-old cousin and future son-in-law Ali ibn Abi Talib, and his future father-in-law Abu Bakr.

Once someone converts to Islam, they cannot leave, as Hadith Sahih al-Bukhari (Vol. 9, Bk. 84, No. 57) stated:

Mohammed said, “Whoever changes his Islamic religion, kill him.” (Mu’atta Imam Malik’s Hadith “break his neck”)

Shaykh ‘Abd-Allaah ibn Jibreen stated:

If your wife leaves Islam and if she does not repent then the ruling of Allah should be carried out on her, which is execution, because the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “Whoever changes his religion [leaves Islam], execute him.”


Muslims are not encouraged to critically examine their faith, as they could be accused of doubting and punished by death.

The University of California website has a page where one can search the Qur’an, yet it displays a:

“Warning (especially for Muslims).”


MOHAMMED’S WIVES

Mohammed’s first wife, Khadijah, financed him while he spent time meditating. She died around 620 AD.

Following her death, Mohammed had 11 to 15 wives and many concubines, consorts and slave mistresses. (Hadith al-Tabari vol. 9 p.126-127)

His wives names were: Sawda, Aisha, Umm Salama, Hafsa, Zainab (of Jahsh), Juwariya, Umm Habiba, Safia, Maymuna (of Hareth), Fatimah, Hend, Asma (of Saba), Zainab (of Khozayma), Habla, Asma (of Noman), Maria, Rayhana, Umm Sharik, Maymuna (not of Hareth), Zainab (third one), Khawla, and Duba.

Mohammed had a right to a fifth of the women received as war booty, as later did the Caliphs and Sultans.

The Qur’an made it permissible to have sexual relations with women captured in war, “women their right hands possess.” (Sura 23:5-6; 33:50,52; 4:24; 70:29-30).

His wives were obedient, as Mohammed had a particular verse in the Qur’an for them:

O Consorts of the Prophet if any of you were guilty of evident unseemly conduct, the punishment would be doubled to her, and that is easy for Allah. (Sura 33:30)

In the Hadith, Mohammed said:

Woman can be married for religion, her fortune, or her beauty. So marry one for the religion (Abu Issa al-Tarmidi, Sunan al-Tarmidi, Medina n.d., p.275, B: 4, H:1092)

Mohammed’s youngest wife was Aisha. She was 6 or 7 years old when wed and 9 when the marriage was consummated, though some say she was closer to 14.

The Hadith Sahih al-Bukhari recorded:

Narrated Aisha that the prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old. (Hadith Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 7, No. 64)

After Mohammed died, a division arose in Islam:

Sunni Muslims believe Aisha’s father, Abu Bakr, inherited Mohammed’s authority and became the first Caliph.

Shi’a Muslims believe Mohammed’s cousin and son-in-law, Ali Ibn Abi Talib, who was married to Mohammed’s daughter Fatima, was the rightful Caliph.
 
 
 
Part V of William J. Federer's series on the Qur'an is as educational as the the ones preceding it.  Hit the link above and read the whole thing.  Yet another typically frightening look into Islam and its beginnings, not to mention the horrific "prophet" Mohammed.  Of the 1 billion Muslims in the world, it's been realistically estimated that 10% of them are fanatical Islamists who want little more than to see America and Israel destroyed for all time.  The math is easy:  100 million Muslims in the world today are Jihadists of one flavor or another.  I often imagine how we would fight them if they stopped killing each other more than they kill us.  Not a happy thought.  Then again, my site is not known for its joy.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Israel, The Rice Fantasy

condipeace
 
As of Wednesday Israeli civilians were sitting ducks again. Rockets landed near Sderot and near Ashkelon and the Israeli army did not respond. Although the civilians’ luck held out and the rockets only hit open fields, they may have been intended as a show of force and a warning to Israel not to contemplate any further moves.

Condi Rice was in town, and it was time to turn the other cheek. Impressions over the weekend that Israel was finally launching a big operation in Gaza dispelled quickly by Monday morning; Rice was on her way and the Bush administration had signaled its displeasure over Israel’s brief war on terror. Israeli forces were withdrawn in about as much time as it had taken Prime Minister Ehud Olmert to state on Sunday that “Israel has no intention to stop fighting even for one moment.”

It was “peace” time again. The object of Rice’s supplication, Mahmoud Abbas, had said Israel’s strikes in Gaza, which he called “worse than the Holocaust,” made further talks impossible. This clearly caused Rice much more concern than the rockets on the Israeli towns. She has never seen the rockets as an untenable situation; a suspension of talks with Abbas is something else again.

As always, it didn’t matter what the anointed Abbas had done, not done, or said. That a few weeks earlier he had proclaimed three days of mourning for the arch-terrorist George Habash. That he had not reformed a single PA institution, disarmed a single militia, or legitimized Israel in the mind of a single genocidally brainwashed Palestinian child.

Or that he had boastingly told a Jordanian paper just last Thursday that his PLO was the incubator of worldwide terrorism including Hezbollah, that it was he who had “fired the first bullet of the resistance” back in 1965, that he aspired to form another unity government with Hamas, that he would resume “armed conflict” with Israel when the time was right, and that at Annapolis “they wanted us to say we recognize Israel as a Jewish state in the closing statements, but we wouldn't hear of it.”

All that didn’t count, just as for people of Rice’s mindset the actions, inactions, and words of Abbas’s boss and mentor Yasser Arafat had never counted until—and in some cases not even then—the Israeli streets were flowing with blood and strewn with body parts. Yes, Rice, coming to Israel this time, perceived an emergency: not that Hamas was now regularly bombarding not only little, “expendable” Sderot but also larger Ashkelon with its port, hospital, and power plants—but that the talks with Abbas had stopped.
 
 
The excerpt above is from P. David Hornik's "Condi's Peace Dreams" in Front Page Magazine.  An excellent and informative piece, well-written and well worth your time to read it all right now.  The Bush Administration, through Condi Rice, is doing nothing more than ensuring Palestinian Jihad continues to thrive in Israel.  What our two governments are doing to the nation of Israel is an abomination which breeds terror throughout the Middle-East.  Mr. Hornik is right; Israel has become a "laughing-stock" to the Arabs both in the region and around the world.  They point at Israel, and at us, and cackle until they can cackle no more!  Then pray to the fantasy god Allah, and cackle again.  Our nations' behavior where Israel is concerned is disgraceful in the extreme. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Bad Times Ahead" by Yonni the Blogger

If Olmert does not get his act together and respond like a real Prime Minister to the daily rocket attacks and today's murderes at Mercaz Harav Yeshiva, bad things will happen. 

If you don't understand the ramifications of this targeted attack, let me give you some background Mercaz Harav Yeshiva is considered the leading national-religious yeshiva in Israel, with hundreds of elite students. Among its thousands of graduates are leading public figures including senior rabbis and IDF officers. It was founded in 1924 by mandatory Palestine's first chief rabbi, Rabbi Avraham Yitzhak Hacohen Kook. Its longtime head, Rabbi Avraham Shapira, died in September 2007.

This is a stab at the heart of religious Zionism, and if Olmert does not strike back, I am afraid that individual Jews will say enough is enough and strike back at our enemies the Arab in acts of retaliation.

 
 
The question then is; how much more will individual Jews take before they do indeed strike back?  Sometimes you really do have to fight fire with fire.  How would Palestinian families feel if Jews started rocketing and bombing their homes and public gathering places?  Ironic dark comedy is about as lite a statement as I could make on that one.  No doubt the Palestinians deserve it.  Yonni's correct as usual. 
 
There comes a time when your elected government no longer represents the people and protects you from enemies.  To sit around and simply let it continue is folly and downright suicidal.  The Jews of Israel must do something to defend themselves, to go on the offensive, to put the Palestinians in their place once and for all.  For most of the world all this just takes place on the television screen, almost as if it's only a show.  Not to me.  Though I am no Jew, I understand full-well the Commandments of God since even a retard can comprehend them.  Our Lord has told us to stand with Zion and there will always be a large part of me that does just that, even if all I do is write about it.  What I do is certainly more than most, and that's pathetic.
 
The Muslim hordes literally surround Israel, God's people; just as the Lord said they would.  Are we going to let Islam finally make the Jews extinct completely, a memory, something only read of in history books?  I say again; which side are you on?  The Lord of All Creation or Allah?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

More Palestinian Terror Attacks on Israel, Rockets and All

An Israeli soldier killed, three injured, 10 missiles hit Sderot. A second soldier is critically wounded. Their patrol jeep was struck by a roadside bomb outside Kissufim Wednesday night, March 5. DEBKAfile reports, that an average of five of these devices are routinely discovered and defused on the Gaza border fence day by day.

In Sderot, a Qassam rocket set a home ablaze, seriously injuring two occupants. It was the second direct hit to a Sderot home from Gaza Thurs. March 6. The town took 10 Palestinian missiles during the day.

Two Qassam missiles exploded in Sderot Thursday afternoon, one crashing into a home, leaving several people in shock.

 
 
At least 8 Israelis killed, dozens injured, in Palestinian shooting attack at Yeshivat Harav Center in Kiryat Moshe, W. Jerusalem. Of the many injured students, several are in critical or serious condition.

A Palestinian gunman armed with a Kalashnikov gun and a bomb vest stormed the Yeshiva library Thursday night, March 6, and opened automatic fire in all directions at the scores of seminarists studying there. After several minutes, he was shot dead bby a neighboring police officer. He has been identified as resident of the south Jerusalem suburb of Jebal Maqaber, bearer of an Israeli identity card.

Dozens of ambulances collected the casualties as heavy police forces and special military units arrived on the scene and scoured the four-story building in case more terrorists were lurking there.

All the roads leading in and out of Jerusalem were blocked amid a manhunt for the killer’s confederates.

The Lebanese Hizballah’s TV station interrupted broadcasts to name the perpetrators of the attack as the “Imad Mughniyeh Liberators of Galilee.”


 
It's a sad and terrible thing to see human beings behave this way.  The horrors of Islam have brought this upon Israel through lust for blood and fanatical obedience to a God of evil.  Islamists kill each other and all those around them; the center of chaos in the world.  Those of us sitting by and watching are responsible for allowing this to continue.  A tipping-point will be reached soon.  Which side will you fall on?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Israeli Cabinet Approves Offensive Against Hamas and Islamic Jihad

DEBKAfile’s military sources disclose that Israel’s security cabinet approved Wednesday, March 5, a series of terrorist targets for early attacks as part of a sustained military offensive against escalated Palestinian attacks from Gaza on Israeli civilians.

Prime minister Ehud Olmert and defense minister Ehud Barak earlier obtained a quiet nod from US secretary of state Condoleezza Rice before she wound up her visit. These targets are revealed here by DEBKAfile:

1. Chiefs and senior officers of Hamas’ and Jihad Islami’s armed wings.

2. Their senior political officials in the Gaza strip, excluding prime minister Ismail Haniyeh, but including hard-line Mahmoud a-Zahar.

3. Hamas and Jihad institutions, including police stations.

These decisions were taken at the security cabinet’s first exhaustive review of Israel’s Gaza options.

DEBKAfile’s sources reveal the ministers considered demolishing urban districts in Gaza which serve as launching pads for missiles after evacuating their inhabitants. No final decision was reached on this.

Our military sources report that these strikes are expected to let loose a stepped up Hamas Grad rocket barrage against Ashkelon or even points further north, such as Ashdod, both important Mediterranean port cities. Sderot, Netivot and Ofakim may also come under heavy missile attack and Hamas will make a supreme effort to bring off suicide attacks inside Israel.

Notwithstanding this expectation, the defense minister is determined to deny Hamas the ability to create a balance of deterrent with Israel. Therefore, the Israeli operation will persist even under heavy Hamas assaults.

In any case, the Palestinians launched a fresh onslaught on the heels of Rice’s departure after her talks with Palestinian and Israel leaders.

Five Katyusha rockets fired from Gaza at Ashkelon exploded on empty ground south of the city; four Qassam missiles were aimed at as Sderot and the Eshkol farming region, raising the total from Wednesday morning to eight.

Our military sources believe that the five rockets were deliberately aimed to explode harmlessly as a warning from Hamas of the violence in store if Israeli goes ahead with more military offensives. Military experts informed the cabinet that this was further proof that Hamas is now capable of precise targeting against specific locations.

 
 
It's about time... again!  Israel needs to act now before Hamas targeting abilities get any more "precise" than they already are.  Nice to know Condi Rice finally gave Israel permission to defend itself.  Good for her.  Our negative interference with Israel's military actions are an embarrassment to both our nations.  The appeasement of terrorists and assorted Islamo-fascists should cease immediately if we are to have any hope of permanently defeating them.  If Israel had unleashed itself a week ago there would be no Palestinian attacks today.  The Arab countries who would then want to join the fight could eat a few nukes and be taken care of as well.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Fun With Presidential Politics

It's quite a situation the Democrat Party has managed to put itself in.  A neck-in-neck between Hillary and B. Hussein Obama and the impending disaster of their ever-menacing "super delegates".  All promising to congeal into an ooze of catastrophic proportions at this year's Democrat Convention. 

Hillary Clinton; sometimes down but never out.  The Wicked Witch of the Western World rides her trusty broom across America yet again after a surprising (to some) victory in Rhode Island, Ohio, and Texas on Super Tuesday Part Duh.  Since I really have no problem saying "I told you so":  I told you so.  After dreaming of such high political power as occupying the White House since graduating college, it's downright silly to think she will just give-up because all-too-bearded Bill Richardson tells her to.  There's little doubt at this point that the super delegates, and others high on the Democrat Totem Poll, who pledged support to B. Hussein Obama are seriously re-thinking their position.  What's more, a good many of them are wondering exactly what Hillary's going to do to inflict as much revenge as possible on those believing they could escape her will by fleeing to B. Hussein Obama.  If the ones who jumped ship too soon don't come back on board before Hillary wins the nomination, there's sure to be a wrathful reckoning soon after she takes the helm.  Needless to say, I don't envy those in her way if indeed Senator Clinton manages to cook-up a victory over B. Hussein Obama.
 
Speaking of B. Hussein Obama; his lovely wife must be throwing lamps and Bibles left and right in their hotel rooms after Little Tuesday.  Barack is surely covering-up all those bruises with makeup.  I often find myself wondering:  Does Michelle Obama desire the White House just a tad bit more than her husband?  The perfect storm came together leading up to last Tuesday with multiple questions about multiple allegations from the press seeming to dog B. Hussein Obama at every turn.  Ties to a terrorist organization and loss of the Jewish vote, NAFTA-gate, fun with Resco and the Obama dream house, and finally a light shown on his lack of experience with foreign policy spawned by Hillary's "Who Will You Trust at 3am" commercial.  The Obama campaign was skating right along too easily for their own good.  The fantasy of an easy nomination shattered with the very real prospect of being reduced to bickering with Hillary over super delegates.
 
I would be lying if I said I didn't find all this fascinating.  Afterall, what's so interesting about the Republican Party these days?  John McCain?  The words "interesting" and "McCain" don't really fit do they?  Our candidate is about as cranky and boring as they come.  The candidate we all said had zero chance of being the GOP nominee is now the GOP nominee.  The very same Senator no one wanted while even cringing at the thought of him representing the Republican Party is now the only choice if you vote Republican.  The fact is, the Republican Party has fallen away from conservatism and John McCain actually does represent the ideology of what has become the Liberal Republican Party of America.  Also, take a quick peek at the voter turn-out on Little Tuesday.  Both Hillary and Barack got over twice as many votes each as John McCain.  Conservative GOP voters are either staying home or switching over.  Our candidate was chosen for us by the liberal media as we all sat by and watched in horror at events unfolding before our very eyes.  The Presidential political landscape has a great deal of changing to do if Republicans want to keep the White House for the next four years.  Conservative patriots have no candidate and for the first time a Clinton looks better than our own nominee.  It's going to be a long four years running up to 2012.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Hillary: Stand By Some Other Man" by Ann Coulter

The mainstream media said she was finished, but our brave Hillary soldiered on to wallop B. Hussein Obama in Ohio, Texas and Rhode Island Tuesday night. I don't know what the MSM is so upset about-- we let them pick the Republican nominee. Did they want to pick the Democratic nominee, too?

Not only that, but after some toothsome appearances on various madcap comedy shows this past week -- "Saturday Night Live," "Late Night With David Letterman," "Hardball With Chris Matthews" -- Hillary's "likability" quotient is soaring! According to the latest CNN/CBS News poll, she's just been upgraded from "Utterly Loathsome" to "Execrable."

The percentage of registered voters who would rather disembowel themselves with a wooden spoon than vote for Hillary has just slipped below the magical 50 percent mark. We're surging, Hillary! If you want to be even more likable, you should go on "The View." Next to those four harpies, you seem almost agreeable.

Now that Hillary has won three primaries in a row, it's time for Obama to do the classy thing and withdraw from the race. (Obama won Vermont, but that was earlier in the day. Exit polls indicate he took the black vote. Literally. There was just the one.)

Imagine how proud Michelle Obama would be of her country if that happened! But Obama probably won't do the classy thing, despite claiming to be a "new" kind of politician and rejecting the politics of division.

If Hillary is serious about becoming president, she's got to make some changes. I say this as a Hillary supporter and strong opponent of divorce. Hillary: You've got to divorce Bill. You've already fired one campaign manager. Now it's time to get rid of your No. 1 buzz-killer.

 
 
Hit the link above and read Ann Coulter's entire column at Human Events.  Divorce Bill Clinton?  Is that possible?  Could she ever do it?  She should, obviously; but would she?  I think probably not.  Their marriage is not for love but for power, and if she was going to divorce Bill she'd wait until she either had the White House back or loses the election.  Ann's point is well-taken however.  The thrill is definitely gone.  He's become more of a liability than a "rock star".  Besides calling him a "rock star" gives a bad name to herpes-infested heroin-abusing illiterate musicians.
 
Great news though:  Hillary won Texas and Ohio and did what so many all-knowing pundits on the talk radio circuit said she couldn't do.  She made a come-back and dashed B. Hussein Obama's hopes of having the playing field all to himself.  By my mathematically-impaired calculations, niether Obama or Hillary will be reaching the magic number of 2025 in order to become the nominee before the convention.  That means the sooper-dooper-pooper-scooper delegates of the elite Democrat Party are the key to the success of either.  So we're looking at a real convention for once.  Should be an interesting evening on DNC day.  Smoke-filled rooms (most likely from the weed), back-office deals, shady atheists (ie. Howard Dean), minions from Mordor; you know, the whole gang.  I'm certainly looking forward to it!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Muslim Terrorist Arrested for Threatening Univ. of Illinois-Chicago Campus

A 24-year-old Wheaton, Illinois resident was arrested for making e-mail threats against the University of Illinois-Chicago campus. Mahtab Shirani was nabbed Tuesday, February 26th, by members of the Chicago FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF), according to John W. Richardson, Chief of the University Police Department.

Shirani was charged in a criminal complaint filed in federal court in Chicago with one count of making threats through use of interstate commerce, which is a felony offense.

According to the police complaint, an individual subsequently identified as Shirani, who is a student at the University, sent an anonymous e-mail to a university administrator threatening a repeat of the shooting incident that had taken place the previous day at Northern Illinois University. The threat stated that a group of five individuals would carry out the attack sometime during the spring 2008 semester. However, the caller failed to give a reason for making the threat.

Subsequent investigation by the university's police officers determined that the threatening e-mail was sent from a computer in the campus computer laboratory. It was also determined the user ID for the computer in question was assigned to the suspect, Shirani.

Further investigation eventually led to the identification of Shirani as the suspect responsible for sending the threatening e-mail.
 
 
 
Looks like Shirani should have attended Georgetown University, where they welcome terrorists and their money instead of arresting them.  Too bad for her.  Question:  There's a university in America that doesn't coddle Islamic terrorists?  Who'd have thunk it!  There could be hope for us yet.  A job well done at the University of Illinois-Chicago campus.  I'm willing to bet if the FBI looked further they would find more nutty terrorists hiding in our college campuses around the country. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Georgetown U: Saudi Ties Are No Biggie

A $20 million gift from a Saudi Arabian prince to a Georgetown University academic center has not affected its scholarly work, Georgetown's president said in response to questions from a U.S. congressman.

Since receiving the $20 million from Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal in 2005, "all activities of the Center have been conducted in the most appropriate manner, and with no outside interference of any kind," Georgetown President John J. DeGioia wrote.

U.S. Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA), wrote to DeGioia Feb. 14th , saying he was concerned about Prince Alwaleed's gift to Georgetown's Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding (which was renamed in the prince's honor) and the affect it had on research. Has anyone at the Center conducted research critical of Saudi educational or human rights policies? Wolf also asked whether the money fueled any of the school's training of current and prospective U.S. Foreign Service personnel.

"[A]ll of us at Georgetown University take very seriously the importance of protecting academic freedom," DeGioia wrote. "I want to assure you that I am completely confident that the Center's work, to borrow your words, ‘maintains the impartiality and integrity' that we expect of all research conducted at Georgetown University."

The response misses the point, said Martin Kramer, former director of the Moshe Dayan Center for Middle Eastern and African Studies at Tel Aviv University and a fellow at Harvard and the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. The concern is not that Georgetown takes marching orders from a significant donor. It is more a question of how bold scholars choose to be in challenging institutions and governments home to deep-pocketed potential donors.

"No one at such a center could possibly specialize in contemporary Saudi policy, because to do so objectively would not sit well with the Saudi princes who make the gifts," Kramer said in an e-mail exchange. "Replicate this a hundred-fold across academe, at universities that would also like $20 million for Islamo-this-or-that, and you have killed off the critical study of Saudi Arabia in the academy. This is no small achievement: the political structure and social norms of the Kingdom are not of the sort that endear themselves to the ‘progressives' in our universities. But the academics are silent, because they hope and pray that someday, their prince will come."

It's a testament to the Center's value that it works with the departments of State, Homeland Security, Defense and the FBI, DeGioia wrote. To that, Kramer said he is more alarmed than reassured.

"The faculty of the Center have consistently underestimated and downplayed the threat posed by radical Islamism," he wrote. "Prior to 9/11 and since then, they have played a considerable role in obfuscating the dangers facing the United States – something our officials can ill afford now and in the future."

 
 
Dealing with the Devil at Georgetown University.  Everyone:  If you love supporting Saudi Arabia's special brand of Islamo-fascism and terror, head on over to Georgetown U where you too can learn how to be a Jihadist and fight the oppressive regime of America!  Gooo Georgetown U!  The university where you can graduate phi-kappa-Jihad with honors!  I'm pretty sure it's time to cut-off all Federal and state money to The Little Saudi School That Could.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Leaving Our Children Behind - School Vouchers

Late in the morning of Friday, February 29th, Miami (Florida) Edison High School was besieged by dozens of police cars and vans. Officers in riot gear were seen rushing into the building and within minutes live TV film from a WFOR-TV helicopter showed dozens of students being led away in handcuffs. Police officials described the situation as a “large scale disturbance.”

This was not an uprising in a Baghdad market or an attack on a funeral procession in Islamabad. This was an insurrection in an American high school, led by teenage thugs with rap sheets longer than their arms. But what makes this sad event so meaningful is that Miami Edison is typical of thousands of failing secondary schools in cities across the nation.

According to a New York Times story in early 2007, of those students who took the ACT college admissions test in 2005, only 51% achieved the C-level benchmark in reading comprehension, 41% in mathematics, and 26% in science.

In response to this horrible record of under-achievement in public education, Republicans have for many years proposed a system of school vouchers that would allow parents to take a pro-rata share of the money that local school districts would spend on each of their children and use it to pay tuition in the private school of their choice – either parochial or nonsectarian. The principal motivation of vouchers would be to inject an element of competition into public education, requiring public schools to compete for education dollars.

The concept has met with little success in Congress because of opposition from teachers unions, primarily the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) and the National Education Association (NEA), two of the most powerful lobbies in Washington and both bedrock constituencies of the Democrat Party. However, state and local governments, the “laboratories” of American government, have begun to experiment with voucher programs.

 
 
We give people freedom of choice when it comes to aborting our children; Heaven forbid we give parents the choice to educate them.  Not allowing school vouchers should be against the law.  Forcing children to attend broken and violent public schools is about as backwards as it gets.  Communist teachers and gang violence rule the day in the American public school system.  The one small helping-hand parents could have to educate their kids is removed from them on a Federal level.  The light at the end of the tunnel is still state and local governments which can offer school vouchers and should.  Considering the recurring theme of horror and ignorance in our public school systems, private education and home-schooling is often times the best way to give children a wholesome learning environment.  All I can say to parents is to keep pushing for school vouchers in whatever way you can.  Get involved in your local government and don't let up until school vouchers are available for your family.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"The Saudis: Which Side Are They On?" by Robert Spencer

 
Saudi officials announced Monday that they had arrested 56 members of Al-Qaeda, who were at an “advanced stage” of planning jihad terror attacks within the Kingdom.

This would seem to support President Bush’s statement from last October, when in order to free up aid from the Saudis he declared: “I hereby certify that Saudi Arabia is cooperating with efforts to combat international terrorism and that the proposed assistance will help facilitate that effort.” As jarring as it may be to contemplate the notion that the United States is providing aid to the oil-rich House of Saud, these arrests indicate that at least it seems to be paying off.

Yet nagging questions remain. Last September, Stuart Levey, the Undersecretary of the Treasury for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence, noted that the Saudis had not prosecuted even a single individual who has been identified by the U.S. or the U.N. as a bankroller of jihad terror. “If I could somehow snap my fingers and cut off the funding from one country,” Levey said, “it would be Saudi Arabia.”

What’s more, an undercover reconnaissance survey of mosques and Islamic schools all over the United States has found that as many as seventy-five percent of mosques and Islamic schools in this country preach jihad warfare and Islamic supremacism. Frank Gaffney of the Center for Security Policy, according to a World Net Daily report, “confirmed that ‘the vast majority’ are inciting insurrection and jihad through sermons by Saudi-trained imams and anti-Western literature, videos and textbooks.”


 
Ah Saudi Arabia.  The conundrum that shouldn't be.  Robert Spencer goes on to explain in the article linked above that the al-Qaeda arrested weren't arrested so much for committing Jihad as they were for committing Jihad in the wrong place.  Stupid Jihadists!  They're supposed to be killing Jews and Americans.  Islamist radical fanatics never learn.  If those murderers in the Middle-East ever stopped killing each other and banded together the world really would have a huge problem, even worse than it has today.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Communists Attempt to Take-Over California Public Schools

A new plan by a California lawmaker would allow schools to be used to promote the overthrow of the U.S. government, and let teachers in public district classrooms "inculcate in the mind of any pupil a preference for communism," according to a traditional values advocacy organization.

"Just when we thought the indoctrination in California's public schools couldn't get any worse, state lawmakers introduce bills that will further brainwash innocent children," said a statement from Capitol Resource Institute, a traditional values and family advocacy organization based in California.

"We're in California. Of course it has a chance of succeeding," CRI spokeswoman Karen England told WND. "These people get bolder and bolder every year."

Her organization, along with several others, already has been battling over lawmakers' orders, already placed in law, that public schools in the state teach nothing but positive messages about homosexuality, transsexuality, bisexuality and other alternative lifestyles.

Those plans are being challenged in court, by citizens' attempts to place the issue on the 2008 election ballot and by family advocates who say the best option is for families to abandon public schools for private schools or other alternatives.

Now comes the plan, SB 1322, from state Sen. Alan Lowenthal, a Democrat elected from the state's 27th District, including the towns of Artesia, Avalon, Bellflower, Cerritos, Downey, Lakewood, Long Beach, Lynwood, Paramount, Signal Hill, South Gate and others.

"This bill would actually allow the promotion of communism in public schools," CRI said.

That's because the state's Civic Center Act already requires a school district to grant the use of school property, when an alternative isn't available, to nonprofit groups, clubs or associations set up for youth and school activities.

"But the law also states that the property may not be used by anyone intent on overthrowing the government," CRI said. Now, the group said, "SB 1322 would delete the requirement that an individual or organization wanting to use the school property is not a Communist action organization or Communist front organization.

"This bill would also strike the law that a public school or community college employee may be fired if he or she is a member of the Communist Party," the group said.

 
 
I thought the Communists had already taken-over California's public school system.  Isn't this old news?  It really is scary though how Communist ideology has infiltrated American schools and colleges.  I'm shocked at how many different classes Karl Marx is being taught in our universities.  Isn't there some sort of anti-Communist test we can inflict on would-be teachers and professors?  The First Amendment does not cover over-throwing the United States government last time I checked.  Now, I admit it has been a while since I've actually checked personally but I'm pretty sure it's in there somewhere.  Commies.  They never rest.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Israel Sanctions al-Jihad-Jazeera

Foreign Ministry spokespeople are refusing requests to appear on Al-Jazeera because of what the ministry deems heavily biased coverage of the situation in the Gaza Strip, a ministry official said Tuesday. 

The official's statement came a day after Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni ripped into the Qatar-based network at a meeting with ambassadors posted here, saying that "when depicting Israeli attacks, Al-Jazeera abuses the situation on the ground by telling lies. Unfortunately, during these attacks, civilians were killed. I am not trying to change facts. But, of course, when it comes to Al-Jazeera, everything is exaggerated."
 
To support the argument of an Al-Jazeera bias, one Foreign Ministry official quoted from comments senior Hamas official Mahmoud Zahar made Monday on Hamas's television station, Al-Aksa, saying that "after I thank God, the Praised and the Almighty, I thank the people of the media... specifically the Al-Aksa and Al-Jazeera stations, and all the stations that showed pictures of the pulse of the Palestinian majority."

"Thank you to all those who gave support in presenting the pulse of the Palestinian majority, which says we will resist until the Day of Judgment," he said.

 
 
So Israel's just now getting around to doing something about the terror network al-Jazeera?  Better late than never I suppose.  Al-Jazeera committing to honest reporting would be like committing treason unto Islam.  Perish the thought!  A simple assault on al-Jazeera's terrorist headquarters would go a long way towards steering them towards ethical reporting.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive