About Me

Name: Cary Wesberry
Email: carywesberry@sbcglobal.net Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

War on the 5th Column Begins: Patriotic Jews Attempt to Destroy House of Yeshiva Murderer

Hundreds of extreme right-wing activists break through police barriers, enter east Jerusalem neighborhood of Jabel Mukaber in bid to destroy house of terrorist who killed eight yeshiva students in Jerusalem. Two policemen lightly hurt in clashes; 22 people arrested 

Aviram Zino Latest Update: 03.16.08, 18:43 / Israel News

More than 100 extreme right-wing activists arrived Sunday afternoon at the east Jerusalem neighborhood of Jabel Mukaber and began hurling stones at houses. Large police forces were dispatched to the area and 22 of the rioters were arrested. Two policemen were lightly injured in the clashes.

Hundreds of demonstrators gathered earlier at Jerusalem's Armon Hanatziv promenade in order to march to the Arab neighborhood and destroy the house of the terrorist who killed eight students at the Mercaz Harav yeshiva about 10 days ago.

Hundreds of police officers attempted to block the protestors, but many managed to break through the barriers and reach the neighborhood.

The rightists called for revenge, and one of them told Ynet, "We are fed up with keeping silent. Jewish blood will not be abandoned. It's time to stop the defamation of God and this disgrace. We are going to destroy the terrorist's house."
Right-wing activist Itamar Ben-Gvir said, "The Israeli government and the Israel Police are responsible for what is happening in Jabel Mukaber."

"This is the beginning of our war on the fifth column. We shall not let them live amongst us," said one of the demonstrators, Nadia Matar of the Women in Green organization.

A statement released Thursday by Women in Green, Komemuyut, Halev Hayehudi ("The Jewish Heart") and bereaved families' organizations said that “in light of the complete incompetence of the political authorities and their inability to at least destroy the murderer's home and expel his relatives and supporters, we must take matters into our own hands as emissaries of the Jewish people."

Police handed the terrorist's body to his family members last Thursday. He was buried at the presence of a small number of people. No unusual incidents were recorded during the funeral.
Ten days after the deadly terror attack in the capital, the political and legal arenas continue to engage in the question whether the terrorist's house should be destroyed. Defense Minister Ehud Barak said that he supported the demolition of the house, and Internal Security Minister Avi Dichter issued an order for its demolition.

However, Colonel (res.) Ilan Katz, the former deputy chief military prosecutor, told Ynet that "there would be a legal difficulty in destroying the house, due to a decision made by a military committee in 2005 that the effectiveness of the deterrence in such cases has worn out."
 
 
 
Hope of Israel!- The righteous Jew.  Nevermind the police, the Jews need to burn that house of evil to the ground.  Finally Jews are standing proud and defiant against terrorist Palestinian monsters.  I could not be more proud of those participating in the protest described above.  Our Heavenly Father surely does not want them to stop at this one house.  The Jews of Israel need to rise-up and remove all Palestinians from their country forever.  No Jews are allowed in upon penalty of torture and death throughout the Middle-East, yet Israel is to allow Arabs to live inside their country and murder their people.  Outrageous!  The patriots discussed in this article are not "extreme right-wing" protestors; they are righteous men and women who simply aren't going to be force-fed subservience to Islam while watching their brothers and sisters murdered in the streets by those who were shown hospitality and kindness. 
 
May these Jews continue their crusade with the Grace of God.  Destroy the 5th Column inside Israel!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Jews in Paris Denounce Peres as Traitor for Arming Palestinian Murderers

(IsraelNN.com) A group of young Parisian Jews interrupted Israeli President Shimon Peres's speech before a crowd of thousands in a gala evening Thursday and blamed him for the deaths of yeshiva students at Mercaz HaRav a week earlier, because of his transferring tens of thousands of assault rifles to Arab factions in Judea, Samaria, and Gaza.

The incident occurred towards the end of a gala evening held in honor of Mr. Peres at the Palais des Congrès in Paris. The evening consisted of a series of speeches by Jewish functionaries and French government officials, as well as artistic interludes. France's Chief Rabbi Joseph Chaim Sitruk implored Peres to keep Jerusalem united and whole.
Peres got up to speak at the end of the evening. He described the cooperation between France and Israel as "wonderful" and at a certain point mentioned that his visit had begun with a memorial prayer at a synagogue for the eight yeshiva boys who were massacred at Mercaz HaRav in Jerusalem a week earlier.

'You killed them!'
At this point a Jewish man stood up and shouted at Peres: "Thousands of Israelis were murdered because of you since Oslo!" As part of the Oslo accords, the Rabin-Peres government transferred tens of thousands of assault rifles to Yasser Arafat's forces reasoning that Arafat would help defend Israel by fighting other Arab terror factions.

Then ten young people also stood up and began to shout "traitor" in Hebrew ("boged!"). They also accused Peres of being responsible for the killing of the eight Mercaz Harav students. "Your guns killed them!," they shouted.

According to an eyewitness, Peres replied to the youths: "I don’t know who you are to say who is traitor and who is not, but if you speak so loudly, this shows that you are a fringe minority."

After a full 15 minutes, the youths were evicted from the hall by security guards who were employed by the Jewish community.

 
 
 
The "youths" had every reason to name Peres as a traitor to his country.  Wilfully transferring arms to those you know full-well are going to immediately turn them on your own people is literally aiding the enemy.  Those who arm the Palestinians are just as responsible for the murder of Jews as those who pull the trigger.  The Palestinians have never been appeased and they never will be until every single Jew in Israel is dead.  Maybe Peres was only trying to speed up the process.  His actions surely speak to that.  The Jews who protested him in Paris are patriots and should be praised for their actions.  At least they have the guts to stand-up for their country, which is much more than anyone can honestly say about men like Peres and Olmert.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Israel's 5th Column

(IsraelNN.com) Several nationalist organizations are calling upon the public to join them as they march on the home of the terrorist who massacred eight Merkaz HaRav students and destroy it.

The police, already on high alert because of terrorist warnings, are planning to deploy large forces to stop the march.

The march is set to begin at 5 p.m. Sunday afternoon from the Banks Junction on Hevron Rd. in the south Jerusalem neighborhood of Talpiyot. It is being sponsored by Beit El-based Komemiyut (Standing Tall), Women in Green, Lev Yehudi (Jewish Heart), and the bereaved families.

Red, black and white posters that can be seen all around Jerusalem blare, "The Arab enemy is inside Jerusalem! The mourning period is over. It's time to destroy the terrorist's house and wipe out the evil from our midst."

"Government Has Done Nothing"
Moshe Musa Cohen, a Komemiyut organizer, told Arutz-7's Hebrew newsmagazine about the initiative: "It's been over a week, and our government has not yet provided a real response to the slaughter in Merkaz HaRav. The same government that destroyed thousands of homes in Gush Katif can't destroy the home of just one terrorist? The still-standing home of the terrorist is a symbol of the government's weakness and failure to act. They want quiet while they carry out their mistaken diplomatic policies, and are generally unwilling to take action, and that's why the house is still standing."

"They keep talking about completing the partition fence," Cohen said, "yet this terrorist came from within the fence! He is a full-fledged resident of Israel." Most Arabs of eastern Jerusalem are residents with near-total citizenship rights, except for the right to vote in national elections. In 1980, when Israel annexed the entire city of Jerusalem, the Arab residents were given the right to full citizenship, just like the other Arabs of Israel, if they would learn Hebrew and pledge allegiance to the country; most of them refused.

The Message: Internal Enemy Must be Fought
"When a country is afraid to deal with its enemies in its own capital," Cohen said, "that is a sign of bankruptcy... For us, it is hard to sit quietly; we want to express our protest and destroy the house."

Cohen does not expect to fulfill his second objective of destroying the house: "The same police whose men stayed outside Merkaz HaRav while the terrorist massacred the students, will be out in force to make sure that we don't get close to the house. But at least we will get our message across: We have an Arab enemy in Israel, and we must protect ourselves and fight against him."

"There is a fifth column inside the State of Israel," Cohen said, "and that is the Israeli-Arabs. We don't see a solution to this problem."

Matar: Boycott Arab Transport Company
Nadia Matar of Women in Green said, "The family of this terrorist is a wealthy one; it runs the Tiyulei HaPninah transportation company in Jerusalem, and we should boycott it."

Matar further said, "Today's protest is an important one. It begins a new campaign regarding the future of our country, and it is good that this issue is being raised... The government has not razed the house because it is afraid of the Arab MKs' reaction - just like it is afraid to attack Gaza and stop the Kassams. The government thus does not represent Jewish interests."

Israeli-Arabs Happy With Attack
Not only have the Arab Knesset Members not condemned or spoken out against the murder of the eight yeshiva students, other Israeli-Arab elements have actually implied praise of it. The main headline in the Islamic Movement’s Al-Mithaak weekly the day after the attack read, “The First Response to the Massacre in Gaza!!!”

The body of the story said: “In a first response to [Israel's] acts of slaughter [in Gaza], Palestinians carried out an operation yesterday in which eight Israelis were killed and ten wounded.” The story refrained from using the term “terror attack,” “murder” or “terrorist.”

This week’s edition of the Al-Mithaak weekly reported on Wednesday's IDF liquidation of four senior terrorists in Bethlehem as follows: “After the Massacre in Gaza: The occupation turns to perpetrating massacres in the West Bank as undercover agents carry out massacre in heart of Bethlehem.”

Chabad Response: Israel is the Only Place
Rabbi Menachem Brod of the Young Chabad movement wrote in this week's Sichat HaShavua:

"If there is something more horrific than the terrible massacre of the yeshiva students hunched over their Torah texts, it is the quick return to the daily routine and the indications that the government is not planning to do a thing to respond appropriately to this crime. Nearly 52 years ago, we saw similar photos when terrorists infiltrated Kfar Chabad and shot and killed five students and a teacher as they were praying Maariv [the evening prayer]. This event was one of the factors that caused the Government of Israel to begin the Kadesh Operation [Suez Canal War of 1956]. But today, the government merely suffices with an expression of sorrow.

"In the past, this type of event was called a pogrom. Jewish communities were aroused to demand that the world not stand silently in the face of Jewish bloodshed. We used to be told that the establishment of the State of Israel was in order to prevent Jewish blood from being spilled wantonly - but now it turns out that the Jewish State is the only place in the world where yeshiva students can be massacred, and within a few days everything is back to normal, as if this is something we must learn to live with."

 
 
 
The Israeli protestors should burn the homes of the evil Arabs who murder Jews from within their own country right to the ground.  It's almost incomprehensible how Israel has allowed the Palestinians to go this far.  Giving those terrorists the means to murder Jews in cold blood and joy is one of the major reasons I often describe Israel as a suicidal nation.  This protest march is a signal that the Jews of Israel are at a breaking-point where their government is concerned; as well they should be.  If their own leaders won't protect them then the people must do so themselves.  It's not vigilanteism, it's justice.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

U.S. Missiles Kill At Least 16 al-Qaeda Terrorists in Pakistan

Sunday, March 16, they struck a compound identified as an al Qaeda hideout in Dhoog village near Wana, the main town of Pakistan’s tribal South Waziristan district on the Afghan border. An unnamed official said it was an American plane that fired precision-guided missiles at the house, not one of the US drones which have launched a number of missile attacks on terrorist hideouts across the Pakistan border. An Arab and two Turkmen were among the killed, he said.

In January, one of those strikes killed senior al Qaeda commander Abu Laith al-Libi in neighboring North Waziristan.

Extremist terrorist attacks have mounted as the first sitting of the newly-elected Pakistan parliament approaches Monday, March 16. The last one killed a Turkish aid worker and injured several foreigners included five Americans at an Islamabad restaurant Saturday. It was claimed by Taliban.

 
 
 
My only regret is that more al-Qaeda monsters were not slaughtered in the most horrible ways imagineable.  A tip of the hat to our military regardless.  I'll take as many as I can get!  I pray every day that all members of al-Qaeda are brought to Guantanamo and tortured until they die as we laugh, laugh, laugh at cranky old fool John McCain in utter defiance of his stupidity.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Wimp Generation" by Yonni the Blogger

Gazan Uses Humanitarian Permit to Evade Police 7 Adar Bet 5768, 14 March 08 12:48 by Ezra HaLevi

(IsraelNN.com) An Arab man from Gaza granted humanitarian passage through Israel for medical treatment used the opportunity to run away and hide in an Israeli-Arab town.

Security forces launched a wide-scale search, fearing the man was on his way to carry out a terror attack after he evaded security forces at the Erez Crossing.

He was later apprehended in the northern Israel town of Nazareth.

The man had been given authorization to travel through Israel to Egypt for medical treatment.

In the past, at least one Gazan woman receiving medical treatment at an Israeli hospital was caught trying to carry out a suicide bombing.

Radical Leftist Rabbi Arrested For Preventing Evacuation of Wounded Jew
Reform Rabbi Arik Asherman, who heads the radical leftist group Rabbis for Human Rights was arrested in Jerusalem Thursday for inciting local Arabs to riot against Israeli archeological digs and preventing the evacuation of a wounded Jewish resident.

Asherman was detained Wednesday after taking part in a protest against archeological digs in the Shiloah (Silwan) neighborhood of Jerusalem, below the Western Wall to the east. The leftist and Arab protestors clashed with members of the Elad organization, which oversees the digs.

Asherman was first offered a deal by the police to agree not to approach the area for two weeks, but when he refused he was arrested. Rabbis for Human Rights condemned the arrest, and accused police of undermining “efforts to expose the unfair treatment and violations of human rights in the Palestinian territories.”


This is no way to fight a war, can we even think that the greatest generation would in the middle of the Second World War let people out of Germany or Japan so they could be brought to the USA for medical treatment?

Or would the generation of WW2 allow a fifth column of traitors to protest and cause problems like we allow today?

If my fathers generation was the greatest generation, then sadly they failed because they produced the whimp generation in their children.

 
 
 
 
As I've heard Dennis Prager so often say:  The Greatest Generation produced The Worst Generation.  Yonni's right of course, they failed and now we have retards breeding idiots.  You never ever send a violent and extremely dangerous enemy on a safe path to medical care so they can be healed and kill more of your people.  This is commonly known as suicide.  Read Yonni's site daily for a regular dose of outrage from Israel.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

German Chancellor Pressured to Criticize Israel on Historic Visit

Berlin - German Chancellor Angela Merkel has come under pressure to use her historic three-day visit to Israel at the head of a large cabinet delegation to criticize the Jewish state over its settlement policy. The head of the German-Israeli parliamentary group, the Greens politician Jerzy Montag, said Merkel should raise points of difference between Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's government and the Palestinians.

Social Democrat foreign policy spokesman Rolf Muetzenich seconded this view, while Werner Hoyer, a foreign policy spokesman for the liberal FDP regretted that Merkel was not seeing Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas during the visit.

Merkel's office said the chancellor had spoken to Abbas by phone on Friday concerning the status of the current talks initiated by US President George W Bush at Annapolis last year.

Abbas had asked Merkel to raise the issue of Israeli plans to restart the building of settlements in East Jerusalem, saying that this was hampering the Annapolis process.

Abbas welcomed a German proposal to hold a conference on the Middle East in Berlin in June with the aim of boosting efforts to build an effective judicial system and police force in a future Palestinian state.

Merkel pledged to report back to the Palestinian leader on her return from Israel.

Merkel's visit to Israel at the head of a political, business and scientific delegation, to mark 60 years since the founding of the state has been billed in Germany as an "exceptional" event.

The Israeli parliament has changed its rules of procedure to allow Merkel to address it on Tuesday.

In her weekly broadcast Saturday, Merkel underlined "the special and future-oriented relations between our two countries."

She noted that plans to hold annual government consultations at cabinet level with Israel were a first for Germany outside Europe.

During her trip, Merkel is to visit the grave of David Ben-Gurion, Israel's first prime minister, and the Holocaust Memorial of Yad Vashem.

 
 
 
 
How about "no" okay, you radicalized liberal scum.  Not even the left will ruin this "wonder of history", as the Chancellor calls it.  Mahmud Abbas and the other Palestinian-loving creeps are just offended because Merkel gave Israel those Dolphin assault submarines.  To atone for that she must criticize Israel for defending itself against terrorist Jihad.  Too bad!  Chancellor Merkel is doing what's right and I for one am happy to see it.  Don't get me wrong here; she could do a Hell of a lot more.  However, what she's done is better than nothing at all; which is what Israel typically gets from the world including, I'm ashamed to say, my own Secretary of State.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Merkel's Visit to Israel

Some unusual aspects stand out in the German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s four-day official visit to Israel starting Sunday, March 16. One is her arrival with seven of her top ministers, including foreign minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier and defense minister Franz Josef Jung. Both will hold bilateral talks with their Israeli counterparts.

Three items of business bring the German chancellor to Israel:

One: To honor Israel on the 60th anniversary of its founding as a state. She will be the first German chancellor to address the Knesset on Tuesday. Ahead of the event, she said: "Those who keep the Nazi-era history in mind know that the stable and friendly relations of today are one of the miracles of history."

Chancellor Merkel will not hold talks with Palestinian officials on this visit. Before setting out, she spoke on the telephone to Palestinian Authority chairman Mahmoud Abbas to explain this was not a normal working visit but of special significance to German-Israel bilateral relations.

Two: To launch the German-Israeli strategic cooperation forum with a joint cabinet-level meeting in Jerusalem. The cabinet-level consultations will be held in the German and Israeli capitals in turn once a year. The chancellor’s initiative equals de facto recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.

They will be the first Germany is holding regularly outside Europe. Until now, these bilateral cabinet meetings took place only with France, Italy, Spain, Poland and Russia.

Three: To put the finishing touches on Berlin’s preparations to hold a Middle East conference in Berlin in June, attended by the four Quartet members (the US, Russia, the European Union and the UN), Israel and the Palestinians as well as Arab and Muslim governments.

The event aspires to follow up the US-sponsored Annapolis peace conference of last year and further elevate the chancellor and Germany as major figures on the world stage. It caps the drive she launched soon after she assumed the chancellorship in 2006 to carve a place for Germany on the Middle East map, to which end Berlin has tightened its political and military ties with the Gulf states and Israel.

The German hand in the region is cautious and discreet.

At the end of the Israel-Hizballah war in 2006, a German contingent was added to the UN peacekeeping force in South Lebanon. Later, the unit was withdrawn, but a German flotilla continues to cruise Lebanese waters.

German agents participate in the Western intelligence and security protecting the anti-Syrian Lebanese prime minister Fouad Siniora; they are also involved in the security monitoring set-up in the making for cutting down Syrian arms smuggling into Lebanon.

A key component of Berlin’s Middle East disposition is the highly-developed military and intelligence relations with Jerusalem. They include the sale to Israel of German Dolphin assault submarines for its navy.

Before her visit, Merkel stated: "The threats to which the Israeli state is exposed are also threats to us.”


DEBKAfile notes: Sincere as this ringing statement undoubtedly is, there is equally no question that the chancellor has no intention of giving up German’s extensive relations with Iran, Syria and Hizballah. It was only after the third round of UN sanctions had been watered down last week that Berlin agreed to endorse the measure against the Islamic Republic, with which German firms maintain brisk business relations.

Above all, the chancellor is flat against an American or Israeli military action against Iran’s nuclear sites or the revival of warfare between Israel and the Lebanese Hizballah. She is convinced that cautious diplomacy can bring Iran round to stopping short of making a nuclear bomb.

Merkel is also confident that Hizballah can be finessed through Tehran into a constructive role in Lebanese governance and abandoning its militancy for politics.

The architect of Berlin’s Middle East orientation is Ernst Uhrlau, director of German’s external intelligence agency, the BND.

DEBKAfile’s sources report that Uhrlau is thought to be the only important Western intelligence chief who can claim direct ties with Iran’s intelligence chiefs and Hizballah’s security apparatus.

Angela Merkel’s perspective on Israel can be summed up in a word: A genuine commitment to a secure Israel, a willingness to assist in its armament for possible war with Iran and a wish to develop bilateral strategic relations. But she has no intention of giving up Berlin’s strategic ties with Tehran.


 
 
Again, this is truly a historic visit from Germany.  I was personally impressed with the gift of German Dolphin assault submarines to the Israeli Navy.  Obviously Germany is committing itself to arming Israel.  Merkel is playing it cool, and I can hardly blame her given the history involved.  I was also struck by her refusal to meet with the Palestinians on this visit.  She's sending a message, and DEBKAfile's assertion of a "cautious and descreet" German hand in the region is on the mark.  In my opinion this bodes well for Israel's future strength and stability.  Merkel recognizes the importance of a weakened Iran; something Germany and Israel have in common.  A good start.  We'll see how all this plays-out over the next year or so.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's Lunatic Pastor Accuses U.S. of Knowing About Pearl Harbor Attack

Sen. Barack Obama and Rev. Jeremiah Wright
 
Newly released video of Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Democrat presidential contender Sen. Barack Obama's controversial pastor, shows the preacher telling his congregation the United States knew of the attack on Pearl Harbor before the Japanese struck, the U.S. would plant weapons of mass destruction in Iraq "just like the LAPD," and those committing black-on-black crime are "fighting the wrong enemy."

The series of clips, taken from hours of sermons, was broadcast on Fox News' Hannity & Colmes program last night.

At times Wright, who moves his congregation to shouts of agreement, is shown wearing an African dashiki while in the pulpit and, at others, he wears a clerical collar.

Wright, again, called on God to damn America – or "white America, U.S. of KKKA," as he refers to the nation in another sermon – "for killing innocent people ... for treating us citizens as less than human."

As WND reported, in a 2003 sermon Wright encouraged blacks to damn America in God's name and blamed the U.S. for provoking the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks by dropping nuclear weapons on Japan in World War II and supporting Israel since 1947.

Yesterday, in response to mounting criticism over Wright's anti-American and racist comments, Obama issued a statement saying he strongly condemns and denounces "some inflammatory and appalling remarks [Wright] made about our country, our politics, and my political opponents."

Despite having been at the church for two decades, Obama said he was not in attendance when Wright made any of the statements and never heard such talk in private conversations.


 
 
Wow.  Jeremiah Wright just gets creepier by the day.  He blames us for 9/11 and virtually blames us for Pearl Harbor too!  Again, twenty years of attendance and B. Hussein Obama knows nothing of these beliefs.  The man is a liar and his pastor is mentally deranged if not completely off his rocker.  The question stands:  Why didn't Obama leave his church after the first or second sermon twenty years ago?  The obvious answer:  He agrees with Wrights twisted and hateful ideology.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Wal-Mart in Dearborn Freaks-Out Over Islam!

DEARBORN, Mich. (AP) -- Faten Saad knew she wasn't in a typical Wal-Mart when she saw an end-of-the-aisle display featuring Mamool.

Boxes of the date-filled, whole wheat cookie from the Middle East welcomed the 21-year-old Lebanon native into the international aisle of the new Wal-Mart store in this Detroit suburb known as the capital of Arab America. Aisle 3, which also features Eastern European and Hispanic food, represents many of the 550 items geared toward Arab-American shoppers in the store that opened last week.

It might be statistically tiny in a store with more than 150,000 items, but it's symbolically huge for the world's largest retailer as it seeks to change from a cost-is-everything monolith to one that customizes its stores to meet neighborhood needs.

Managers say they seek peace with the neighborhood's merchants -- and vow not to undercut them on Middle Eastern specialties. But some experts and observers say Wal-Mart's well-planned launch in Dearborn is bound to shake up the buying and selling in a community that has long supported its own. Southeastern Michigan is home to an estimated 300,000 people who trace their roots to the Middle East.

"I have not heard of anything this tailored. It's inspiring to me as a shareholder," said Patricia Edwards, portfolio manager and retail analyst in the Seattle office of San Francisco-based investment manager Wentworth, Hauser & Violich, which has 537,000 shares of Wal-Mart Stores Inc. stock.

The Dearborn store also sells Arabic music and plans to offer Muslim greeting cards. But the modifications go beyond merchandise: It has 35 employees who speak Arabic -- noted in Arabic script on their badges. The store also has hired a local Arab-American educator to teach the staff cultural sensitivity.

It's clear as soon as shoppers walk in that this isn't a typical Wal-Mart.

 
 
 
Teaching "cultural sensitivity" to the staff.  How nice.  Brainwashing Wal-Mart employees shouldn't be that difficult for the Islamists.  I have no doubt the footbathes are coming next.  Why is it that I'm thinking there will be no Mohammed comic books and/or cartoons for sale, even at super-low-low prices?  My culturally sensitive question of the day:  Will they be selling burkhas and turbans at reduced cost to the customer?  I would ask in what color, but I'm pretty sure I already know the answer to that one.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama on Damage Control Over His Anti-Semitic America-Hating Racist Pastor

The presidential contenders have all had their share of supporters whose insensitive remarks forced the campaigns to issue disavowals. This week, it was Barack Obama’s turn.

After a series of recorded sermons by Obama’s longtime pastor the Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr. sparked controversy over Wright’s fiery views on race, America and the Sept. 11 attacks, Obama responded Friday by firmly repudiating Wrights’ views in lengthy written statement and a round of cable news interviews.

On Saturday at a town hall meeting in Plainfield, Ind., Obama broached the matter with the public, saying they’ve probably heard comments “that were incendiary and that I completely reject.”

The question now is whether Obama’s response worked, and whether his connection to Wright will haunt the Democratic senator’s campaign and dampen his presidential hopes.

Rival Hillary Clinton has not yet drawn political attention to the sermons, and deflected questions Saturday.

“Ask the Obama campaign,” she said to inquiries about Wright.

Pollster Doug Schoen said it’s unlikely the Wright issue will play big in the primary, but that it poses trouble down the road.

“In a Democratic primary this issue has limited viability and utility,” he said. “In a general election, however … I think this could be a real serious problem for Barack Obama.”

Obama tried to put Wright’s sermons in perspective Saturday, saying: “It reminds me that we’ve got a tragic history when it comes to race in this country … But what I continue to believe in is this country wants to move beyond these kinds of divisions.”

In an interview Friday with FOX News, Obama said he personally never had heard the pastor’s controversial comments, though he joined his Trinity United Church of Christ nearly 20 years ago. He said the sermons now sparking controversy didn’t resemble the ones he remembers from Wright, which, Obama said, stuck to messages of faith, values and helping people in the community.

But Obama’s pastor long has been a lightning rod for controversy. For starters, Wright’s relationship with Louis Farrakhan, once described by Obama as a “close” relationship, has been of concern to many in the Jewish community.

And once Wright’s remarks were publicized last year, Obama backed out of plans to have Wright speak at his Feb. 10, 2007, presidential announcement.

Author Larry Elder said he doesn’t buy Obama’s new, firmer denunciation of Wright.

“How can Barack Obama dis-invite him … and now claim he had no idea that Jeremiah Wright made all these incendiary comments? It doesn’t work,” Elder told FOX News.


 
 
Elder is right of course.  Hell, I've heard less "incendiary" statements come out of the mouths of KKK Grand Dragons for crying out loud!  I also agree this issue won't be an issue in the primary.  Everyone knows Democrats agree with Jeremiah Wright so it will hardly phase them one way or another.  After all, Democrats always support free speech as long as it's against the Jews, America, and white people.  It's one of their most important rarely-spoken rules if I remember correctly; and I usually do.
 
B. Hussein Obama cannot distance himself from practices he's participated in for twenty years of his life.  Jeremiah Wright, pastor of all that's wrong with America, married Barack and his lovely wife and baptized his children.  Distancing himself from the hateful pastor is impossible at this point, though he will try.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Nancy Says

WASHINGTON — House Speaker Nancy Pelosi says it would be damaging to the Democratic party for its leaders to buck the will of national convention delegates picked in primaries and caucuses, a declaration that gives a boost to Sen. Barack Obama.

“If the votes of the superdelegates overturn what’s happened in the elections, it would be harmful to the Democratic party,” Pelosi said in an interview taped Friday for broadcast Sunday on ABC’s “This Week.”

The California Democrat did not mention either Obama or his rival, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, by name. But her remarks seemed to suggest she was prepared to cast her ballot at the convention in favor of the candidate who emerges from the primary season with the most pledged delegates.

Obama leads Clinton by 142 pledged delegates — those delegates picked in nomination contests to date, in The Associated Press’ count.

Barring an unlikely string of landslide victories by the former first lady in the remaining states, he will end the primary season with a delegate lead, but short of the 2025 needed to win the nomination.

That gives the balance of power to the so-called superdelegates, prominent Democrats who are automatically entitled to attend the convention because of their status as members of Congress or other leaders. Clinton leads Obama for their support in the AP count, 249-213.

Pelosi’s comments could influence other House Democrats who are neutral in the presidential race and will attend the convention as superdelegates.

In her interview, Pelosi also said that even if one candidate winds up with a larger share of the popular vote than the delegate leader, the candidate who has more delegates should prevail.

“It’s a delegate race,” she said. “The way the system works is that the delegates choose the nominee.”

More than 500 delegates remain to be picked in primaries beginning on April 22 in Pennsylvania, which has 158 at stake on April 22.

 
 
 
Yes Nancy, it's a delegate race.  So stop trying to influence it by ordering super delegates to vote one way or another.  You Democrats came up with the nonsensical nomination process now you can wallow in it.  Nancy Pelosi just doesn't want Hillary to win, that's all there is to it.  If the Democrats don't want super delegates to go against the will of the voters in their respective states then they should not have given them the power to do so.  It's not rocket science; it's just Democrat stupidity.  Should we have expected anything less?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pineapple-Head of Venezuela Dares U.S. to Put Him on Terror List

art.chavez.jpg
 
CARACAS, Venezuela (AP) -- President Hugo Chavez dared the U.S. on Friday to put Venezuela on a list of countries accused of supporting terrorism, calling it one more attempt by Washington to undermine him for political reasons.
 
Chavez said the "threat to include us on the terrorist list" is Washington's response to his government's successes in the region.

U.S. lawmakers including Reps. Connie Mack and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, both Florida Republicans, have called for the State Department to add Venezuela to its list of terror sponsors, which includes North Korea, Iran, Syria, Sudan and Cuba. They have expressed concerns about what they call Chavez's close ties to Colombia's leftist rebels.

"Let them make that list and shove it in their pocket," Chavez said in a televised speech.

"We shouldn't forget for an instant that we're in a battle against North American imperialism," Chavez said. "On this continent, they have us as enemy No. 1."


Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Thursday during a visit to Brazil that all U.N. nations, including Venezuela, have an obligation to go after terrorists and keep them from operating within their borders.

The comment was largely a warning for Chavez, who U.S. officials suspect has lent support to Colombian rebels. In recent days, Rice and President Bush have sharpened their rhetoric against Chavez while praising Colombia and other Latin American allies.
Chavez said Rice's visit to Brazil and Chile this week is aimed at mounting "pressures" against "our government and against me."

Chavez also responded to barbs from Bush, who on Wednesday accused Venezuela of squandering its oil wealth internationally "to promote its hostile, anti-American vision."

The heated exchanges with the U.S. came as Chavez and Colombian President Alvaro Uribe pledged to smooth over differences after their worst-ever diplomatic spat, provoked by a deadly Colombian attack on a rebel camp in Ecuador.

Chavez said he called Uribe on Thursday in part "because the statements (against Venezuela) continue," and because the U.S. "keeps trying to make us fight."

He said he told Uribe he wants to rebuild relations after the March 1 cross-border strike, which killed 25 people including a rebel leader.

After Colombia's assault in Ecuador, Chavez and Ecuadorean leader Rafael Correa sent troops to their borders. Colombia released documents found on rebel laptops, saying they link Chavez and Correa's administrations to leftist Colombian rebels.

Correa on Thursday delivered an angry response to Bush's strong support for Colombia in the wake of the raid, challenging the U.S. president to send troops to Ecuador's border with Colombia.

"Bring your soldiers Mr Bush," Correa said in the speech. "Let it be your soldiers who die along the southern border with Colombia. We'll see if the Americans, the citizens of the United States, will accept tremendous atrocity.

"If not, shut your mouth and understand what is happening in Latin America."


Ecuadorean authorities are still angry over the Colombian raid and have delayed restoring diplomatic relations until at least the end of the month.

Meanwhile on Friday, three Mexican students in their late 20s were confirmed killed in Ecuador during Colombia's raid on the rebel camp.

Five Mexicans -- three men and two women -- apparently were at the camp near the border with Colombia during the attack.

Mexican student Lucia Morett Alvarez, 26, was wounded but survived, and parents of another missing Mexican woman were awaiting forensic tests.

Fellow students in Mexico have described the victims as activists who sympathized with Latin America's radical left, which has gained some backing on college campuses in Mexico.

 
 
 
First, Condi Rice tells countries in South America to defend themselves against terrorists while she sides with Palestinian monsters against the Israeli Defense Minister for defending his country against the same kind of evil.  Condi Rice swims in inconsistency and chicanery.  If Colombia was actually made to war with its neighbors in order to defend itself, Rice would demand they stop immediately and talk while their people die.  She's pathetic.
 
Second, the students from Mexico were "activists"?  I find that unbelievable in the extreme.  They were there to support terror and died for it.  Those so-called students were not victims of their activism, they were targets for justice and should shine as an example of what should happen to those who support Communist evil.
 
Third, the retarded dictator of Venezuela Hugo Chavez and his cohort in arms Correa from Ecuador are the ones who need to "shut their mouths" before they too become targets for justice in South America.  Allowing men such as them to exist so close to us is already embarrassing enough to my country.  I wouldn't push it if I were them.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pre-Inca Temple-Fortress Built in the 1100s Found in Peru

art.jpg
 
LIMA, Peru (AP) -- Archaeologists have discovered the ruins of an ancient temple, roadway and irrigation systems at a famed fortress overlooking the Inca capital of Cuzco, according to officials involved with the dig.

The temple on the periphery of the Sacsayhuaman fortress casts added light on pre-Inca cultures of Peru, showing that the site had religious as well as military aims, according to researchers.

It includes 11 rooms thought to have held mummies and idols, lead archaeologist Oscar Rodriguez told The Associated Press.

The team of archaeologists that made the discoveries believes the structures predated the Inca empire but were then significantly developed and expanded.

"It's from both the Inca and pre-Inca cultures; it has a sequence," Washington Camacho, director of the Sacsayhuaman Archaeological Park, told the AP on Thursday. "The Incas entered and changed the form of the temple, as it initially had a more rustic architecture."

Archaeologists are still waiting for carbon dating tests, but Camacho said their calculations about the facilities' age are supported by historical references such as ceramics and construction style.

Previous carbon-14 dating of Sacsayhuaman revealed that the Killke culture constructed the fortress in the 1100s, said Peruvian archaeologist Luis Lumbreras, former director of Peru's National Culture Institute and an expert on Cuzco's pre-Incan cultures. He was not involved in the dig.

The Killke occupied the region from 900 to 1200 A.D., prior to the arrival of the Incas.

"These recent discoveries add to our knowledge of Sacsayhuaman, confirming again the aggregate nature of the fortress," Lumbreras told The Associated Press.

The Inca empire, based in the ancient city of Cuzco, flourished along the western edge of South America during the 1400s, prior to the arrival of the Spanish.

Today, Cuzco is Peru's main tourism hub and a launching point for visitors to the jungle-shrouded ruins of Machu Picchu, 40 miles northwest.

The temple lies a little under a mile from zigzagging walls of the Sacsayhuaman fortress, alongside an enormous rock formation believed to be one of the fortress' burial mounds.

"The temple is one of the most important in the Sacsayhuaman site," Camacho said.

The discovery of the temple reveals "the sacred ceremonial nature of the Killke," Lumbreras said. "Previously we thought Sacsayhuaman was simply a military fortification, but we now see it was a very complex ceremonial center.

Lumbreras, now working with Peru's Institute for the Study of Cultural Patrimony, has extensively studied and excavated sites from the Wari culture, which flourished in Peru's southern highlands from 500 to 1200 A.D.

 
 
New facts are constantly discovered about our ancient history on this planet.  Amazing to me how our knowledge changes so rapidly as we make new discoveries across the many fields of science.  Finds such as this one prove what we hold as true today is often only what we think we know.  There was a time, not very long ago at all, that we thought the Inca culture was the oldest in Peru.  That "fact" was blown away years ago.  How far back in North and South American history do advanced ancient cultures go?  Well into B.C. I'm sure.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Astronauts Power-Up Space Robot, Deliver Kibo Lab, Five Spacewalks in Longest Visit Ever by Shuttle

art.reflect.nasa.ap.jpg    art.space.nasa.ap.jpg
 
art.arm.nasa.ap.jpg    art.shuttle.afp.gi.jpg
 
HOUSTON, Texas (AP) -- With power now flowing to the international space station's new robot, the astronauts aboard the linked shuttle-station complex prepared Saturday for a spacewalk to assemble the giant machine.

On Friday night, astronauts used the space station's mechanical arm to grab onto and energize Dextre, bypassing a faulty cable that wasn't able to transmit power to the robot.

The robot, designed to help maintain the space station, could not be completely put together or tested without power to heat its joints and electronics.

"That was a great workaround that the ground came up with and kind of saved the day," astronaut Garrett Reisman said in a televised interview with the Space.com Web site.
The power bypass kept NASA on track for Saturday night's spacewalk to hook the robot's 11-foot arms to its torso. Spacewalkers have already attached the robot's hands to its arms.

Phil Engelauf, chief of the flight director's office, said everyone on the ground was relieved to see the power problem resolved.

"There was obviously some real concern over the last day or two for getting that powered up," he said.
The shuttle Endeavour and its seven-man crew delivered Dextre -- lying in pieces on its transport bed -- to the space station. It was attached to the exterior of the orbiting outpost on Thursday.

The problem cable is in Dextre's transport bed, or pallet, which the astronauts are using as a staging area to assemble the robot.

The pallet originally was supposed to be attached to one part of the space station and the cable was designed accordingly, said Pierre Jean, Canada's acting space station program manager. The cable should have been updated when officials changed the attachment point, but it wasn't, he said.

Supplying power directly to Dextre via the space station's robot arm circumvented the cable and transport bed.

Jean said the Canadian Space Agency and its main contractor were responsible for designing the cable, but he was reluctant to blame anyone for the error.

"In this case this is not something that was done by negligence or anything like that," he said late Friday.

Earlier in the day, LeRoy Cain, chairman of the mission management team, promised a full investigation "to run this to ground and understand exactly what happened and how and why."

The Canadian-built robot -- which cost more than $200 million -- is intended to be a helper for spacewalking astronauts. It ultimately could take over some spacewalking jobs, saving time for space station crews while reducing their risk.

Once it's completely assembled early next week, the robot will be removed from its transport bed. From that point on, it will be powered from its various attachment points directly on the space station.

Endeavour also delivered the first segment of Japan's Kibo lab, a 14-foot-long storage compartment. The $1 billion lab itself will fly to the space station in May, aboard shuttle Discovery.

Five spacewalks are planned for Endeavour's nearly two-week visit, the longest ever by a shuttle.

On Friday, mission managers concluded that Endeavour's heat shield made it through Tuesday's liftoff in good shape and formally cleared the shuttle for re-entry on March 26.

 
 
 
Scrooges and party-poopers alike can whine all they want about what a huge waste of money our space program, or any space program, is for the taxpayer.  To them I say:  Boooo!  Continuing to achieve what was once thought impossible and explore ever-outward into our universe is never a waste.  It's in the nature of mankind to explore and push ourselves well past all limitations.  Do I think there's more cost-efficient and productive ways of doing this in space?  Absolutely.  That does not, however, mean we shut it all down when the program under-performs or simply displeases a minority of the country. 
 
Most Americans want a space program and a space program we will have.  Don't like it?  I don't care.  Surely these nay-sayers can find better things to do with their time than gripe about wasting money on NASA.  Cut the overspending and stop the chaos in Congress and NASA would be paid for multiple times over.  The space program is a shining achievement for our country and all of humanity.  We have shown we can go beyond pettiness, shoot for the stars, and hit the target.  The representation of such things that our space program provides will always be worth the cost.  America must continue to achieve for the sake of achievement.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Clinton Campaign Just Won't Die

WASHINGTON — Hillary and Bill Clinton are the ultimate political multitaskers. March is only half over, and already she has been underdog, front-runner, comeback kid, victim of attacks, an attacker herself, tested voice of experience and agent of change. Sometimes the Clintons even appear to be triangulating themselves.

Which may be the ultimate goal. If there is one thing we have learned about the Clintons since 1992, it is that the more things roil, the more they thrive. Who was the ultimate political beneficiary of the government shutdown in 1995 and 1996? Bill Clinton, by a mile. Charges and countercharges, allegations, defenses and knockdown, drag-out fights are the Clintons' elements.

Make confusion, doubt and second-guessing your friend. When cornered or down, always make it about the other guy. Where is that right-wing conspiracy when it's needed?

Lose your front-runner status when you are unprepared for a primary opponent with broad appeal and staying power? Say it's the opponent, Barack Obama, who is not prepared.

The Clintons have tried to turn March into the Month of Doubt in the Democratic nomination fight. They have tried to spark buyers' remorse among Democrats by suggesting Obama, who has won 25 states and the District of Columbia, is nothing but a good speech. Her campaign has questioned the Democrats' delegate-selection process and helped stir the Florida and Michigan primary cauldrons.
The Clintons have questioned Obama's campaign tactics when they have been just as tough and divisive. Both Bill and Hillary Clinton have suggested Obama would be a good running mate even though she is behind in delegates and states won.

Confidence or chutzpah?

"It may be the first time in history that the person who is running number two would offer the person running number one the number two post," former Democratic Senate Leader Tom Daschle, an Obama supporter, said on NBC's "Meet the Press." Daschle looked torn between being appalled and having a begrudging admiration for the audacity of the suggestion.

Lesser politicians would have withered by now. Pundits have twice given Hillary Rodham Clinton last political rites, but her tenaciousness and very survival is one of her prime claims for moving on to Pennsylvania on April 22. If anyone can will a nomination, it is she.

The Clintons turn incongruity into political triangulation. After Sen. Clinton's "comeback kid" victories in Ohio, Texas and Rhode Island, the Clintons argued that Obama wasn't ready to be president while suggesting he'd make a fine running mate. Her campaign declared her a victim of negative campaigning — even raised money off it — as their communications director was comparing Obama's campaign tactics with the tactics of Ken Starr, the former special prosecutor roundly despised on the left. What's worse for a Democrat: being called a "monster," as a since-dismissed Obama adviser labeled Hillary Clinton, or being compared with Starr?

The Clintons have argued that the big states she has won are more important to Democrats than the bigger number of smaller states he has carried, even though the Democratic Party under Howard Dean is in its fourth year of a 50-state strategy of leaving no state behind.

Are wear-'em-out, parry, parse, provoke and triangulate the kind of political skills the country needs in its next president? Or is a country wearied by war and the threat of terrorism, concerned about the economy and tired of bickering back and forth in Washington, D.C., ultimately in need of something very different?

Obama's success — he's got a 100-plus delegate lead — would argue so. But the young Illinois senator's inability to close the deal with his come-together campaign also would suggest that the pull of the Go-Go '90s under the Clintons, and admiration for their tenaciousness and yes, even their audacity, is still a strong force in the Democratic Party.

Maybe the fusion ticket both Clintons have suggested is possible, though every day the Clintons play good cop, bad cop on Obama is another day of general election advertising footage for the Republicans. The Democratic Party hierarchy — its superdelegate ranks of elected officials and other party luminaries — may eventually have to decide.

And in that environment — closed-quarters political infighting, dealmaking and parlaying — no one is better than the Clintons.


 
 
The author of the article above from USA Today has made a fairly good summary of Hillary's campaign thus far.  For all the reasons stated I still find it hard to believe she's down for the count.  Pundits have written her off at least twice now only to be proven wrong both times.  The only people who've seemed to make an accurate prediction about Hillary are those like me that don't believe she'll ever quit.  The Clintons keep trudging along unapologetically while B. Hussein Obama gets smacked with more and more negative facts surfacing about his past, and present where is lovely wife is concerned.  The list of negatives against Obama stretches from horrible to just weird.  Since everyone knows what Hillary is all about she can simply sit back and enjoy the show.  What are they going to do?  Ask her about her husband?  Not likely.  Given B. Hussein Obama's twenty year trist with the anti-Semitic pro-Jihad America-hating pastor Jeremiah Wright, I'm convinced more than ever Hillary is the lesser of two evils on the Democrat side. 
 
As far as the GOP goes; we were given a choice between good and evil... we chose evil.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive