About Me

Name: Cary Wesberry
Email: carywesberry@sbcglobal.net Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Hamas Takes Credit for Jerusalem Yeshiva Murders

DEBKAfile’s military and intelligence sources report that, in private conversations, top Hamas commanders are discussing the March 8 attack on the Mercaz Harav yeshiva, which left eight students dead. They are plotting to follow it up with similar terrorist atrocities while slowing down missile and rocket attacks from Gaza.

Our sources disclose the three strategic decisions taken by Hamas leaders for the near future:

1. To give the Gaza ceasefire understanding a chance to take hold. Jihad Islami and the Popular Resistance Committees were responsible for the 26-missile barrage fired Thursday, March 13. One of Hamas’ top men Siad Siyam warned the two groups that it was time to stop shooting and adhere to Hamas’ “resistance” strategy.

2. This requires a halt in missile and rocket fire against Israeli targets - provided that the informal negotiations brokered by Egypt made progress towards Hamas’ goals of reopening the Rafah border terminal between Gaza and Sinai and ending Israel’s blockade of the Hamas-ruled territory. Failing progress in the coming days, Hamas will go back to – and intensify – the rocket attacks on Ashkelon and missile fire on Sderot.

3. Hamas plans more high-profile terrorist attacks inside Israel on the lines of the yeshiva massacre, which they regard as a model to be followed. In private conversations, their leaders insist on these strikes being mounted from the West Bank or Jerusalem - on no account from the Gaza Strip. They boast that by engineering an unclaimed deadly terrorist strike from their haven in Gaza, they have left Israel’s security and intelligence services guessing and deprived its army of an opportunity to hit back – especially in the middle of indirect truce negotiations.


 
The Palestinian monsters plan more such attacks.  The longer the Palestinians are allowed to live in Israel the more violent they will get.  Their very existence is an atrocity.  Palestinians bathe in blood and instead of ridding Israel of this insanity once and for all, the world condemns the Jews.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

53 Percent of Americans now Believe “the U.S. Will Ultimately Succeed in Achieving its Goals” in Iraq

American public support for the military effort in Iraq has reached a high point unseen since the summer of 2006, a development that promises to reshape the political landscape. 

According to late February polling conducted by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, 53 percent of Americans — a slim majority — now believe “the U.S. will ultimately succeed in achieving its goals” in Iraq. That figure is up from 42 percent in September 2007.

The percentage of those who believe the war in Iraq is going “very well” or “fairly well” is also up, from 30 percent in February 2007 to 48 percent today.

The situation in Iraq remains fluid, of course. A surge in violence or in troop deaths could lead to rapid fluctuations in public opinion. But as the war nears its fifth year, the steady upturn in the public mood stands to alter the dynamics of races up and down the ballot.

The repercussions will be most acutely felt in the presidential contest. Democrats Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton remain committed to a staggered pullout, while Republican John McCain holds steadfast in his support for the Bush administration’s military surge.

In recent years, election results have tracked perceptions about the progress of the war in Iraq. The Democratic wave in the 2006 congressional elections correlated to a low point in the public’s view of the war. The resurgence of McCain’s candidacy also tracks the decrease in U.S. fatalities in Iraq. Monthly troop deaths have dropped by about two-thirds since the summer of 2007, according to Department of Defense records.

Democrats’ resolute support for the withdrawal of U.S. combat forces may soon position them at odds with independent voters, in particular, a constituency they need to retake the White House.

Half of self-identified independents polled now believe the United States should “keep troops in Iraq until the situation has stabilized,” according to polling data assembled by Pew at Politico’s request.
 
 
 
Half the people polled in the United States believe we should stay in Iraq until our soldiers have accomplished their mission.  Bad news for the Democrats who've placed their bets on our retreat and defeat.  I wonder of the Democrats have regrets over investing so much in us losing the war in Iraq.  One can wish I suppose.  It's sad to know that so many Democrats want us to lose so they can win political points.  For them, the ends really do justify the means. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Yuma, Arizona Builds Moat to Combat Illegal Alien Invasion

YUMA, Arizona (Reuters) - Most plans to gain control of the porous U.S.-Mexico border focus on some combination of fence. But this city in far west Arizona is looking to build a moat.

Faced with high-levels of crime and illegal immigration, authorities in Yuma are reaching back to a technique as old as a medieval castle to dig out a "security channel" on a crime-ridden stretch of the border and fill it with water.

"The moats that I've seen circled the castle and allowed you to protect yourself, and that's kind of what we're looking at here," said Yuma County Sheriff Ralph Ogden, who is backing the project.

Curbing illegal immigration and securing the nearly 2,000 mile (3,200-kilometre) southwestern border are hot topics in this U.S. election year. Washington has pledged to complete 670 miles of new barriers by the close of 2008, despite resistance from landowners and environmentalists.

The proposal seeks to restore a stretch of the West's greatest waterway, the Colorado River, which has been largely sucked dry by demand from farms and sprawling subdivisions springing up across the parched southwest and in neighboring California.

The plan to revive the river, which drains from the Rocky Mountains through the Grand Canyon and runs for 23 miles (37 kilometers) along the border near Yuma, seeks to create a broad water barrier while also restoring a fragile wetland environment that once thrived in the area.

"What you are building is a moat, but it's bringing the life and the wildlife back", said Ogden, an Old West lawman with a handlebar mustache, explaining how the project differs from other plans to fix the border.

"It's innovative thinking. It doesn't take much brainpower to build a 12-foot high fence around something, but this is unique."

 
 
 
Hallelujah!  Hallelujah!  The good people of Yuma, AZ aren't just whining about the illegal alien invasion of America; they're doing something about it.  A moat.  A freakin' moat!  I am extremely pleased.  Now all they have to do is fill it with sharks and alligators and we'll be set.  It's about damn time law enforcement somewhere in this country got serious about homeland security.  This is a shining example for every single border town in the country; that includes all the cities and towns on the northern border who should be defending us from the space aliens otherwise known as Canadians. 
 
What a wonderful and patriotic action Yuma, AZ is taking in order to protect its citizens.  Not enough good words can be said to express what authorities there are doing.  An actual moat.  Genius!  Oh we've all been fantasizing about it, joking to each other knowing full well it would never happen.  Thank the Lord we were wrong.  Great job Yuma!  Hopefully, God-willing, more cities will follow and soon.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

B. Hussein Obama, the New Mark Twain!!!

On Thursday night’s "Hardball," Chris Matthews compared Barack Obama's writing abilities to those of the great American writer Mark Twain. Prompted by Philadelphia radio talk show host Michael Smerconish’s praise of Obama's first book "Dreams From My Father," the "Hardball" host effused: "It's almost like Mark Twain. It's so American, it's so textured."

The following exchange occurred on the March 13 edition of MSNBC’s "Hardball:"

MICHAEL SMERCONISH, RADIO TALK SHOW HOST: I think that this argument that he's an empty suit is gonna get tested and proven false. I just finished and have spent all week long, reading to my radio audience excerpts of "Dreams From My Father," Barack Obama's first book. And I'm telling your audience on "Hardball," if you want to know what makes this guy tick forget the grandiose, highfalutin speeches this is the real deal.

CHRIS MATTHEWS: Great book.

SMERCONISH: And people can make up their own minds but it's gonna get totally fleshed out.

MATTHEWS: It's unique because he's a politician and not since U.S. Grant has a politician written his own book.

SMERCONISH: Exactly.

MATTHEWS: And that is refreshing.

SMERCONISH: Yes.

MATTHEWS: And you're thoughts here? Did you read the book? Once you read it you have a different take. It's almost like Mark Twain. It's so American, it's so textured. It's so, almost sounding like great fiction because it reads like us. It's picturesque. Is that the right word? Picturesque? I think it's got that quality.

 
 
B. Hussein Obama and Mark Twain.  I have to admit I didn't necessarily expect those two to be favorably compared to each other.  Leave it to Chris Matthews and that creepy little weasel Michael Smerconish to accomplish such an embarrassment.  I'm so very thankful there's such a thing as NewsBusters so I don't have to watch TV myself.  B. Hussein Obama is a Senator from Illinois as well.  Next he'll be Abraham Lincoln!  These idiots make me sick.  To think they get paid to vomit this crap all over television.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Drunk Girl-Drowning Jerk Ted Kennedy Hates National Security

President Bush today issued his first veto threat against the most recent House version of a bill that would permanently update foreign surveillance laws, saying the measure would compromise U.S. national security.

Mr. Bush, speaking to reporters on the south lawn of the White House, faulted House Democratic leaders for not meeting a self-imposed deadline to pass the bill and criticized a portion of the law that would investigate intelligence activities.

"It seems that House leaders are more interested in investigating our intelligence professionals than in giving them the tools they need to protect us," Mr. Bush said.

"Congress should stop playing politics with the past and focus on helping us prevent terrorist attacks in the future," he said.

The House is expected to vote on the bill today, but Mr. Bush urged them to retool the bill and pass a bill he will sign before the leave for recess over the Easter break.

Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, one of 29 senators to vote against the bill when it passed out of the Senate last month, shot back that the president was trying "bully the Congress and mislead the American people."

"The president wants Congress to pretend that his administration did not conduct a massive, illegal, domestic warrantless surveillance program that was one of the most outrageous abuses of executive power in our nation"s history," said the Massachusetts Democrat.

"Rather than accuse Congress of playing politics, the president should stop playing politics with our national security," Mr. Kennedy said. "He is the one who has repeatedly blocked extension of the law, insisting that the phone companies must be protected, even though he claims that American lives are at risk."
 
 
The President of the United States has officially concluded that American lives are at risk and Ted Kennedy only cares about whether or not phone companies are being protected against prosecution for doing what the President of the United States ordered them to do.  Wouldn't they be prosecuted if they didn't comply?  This is what the Democrats do with their power in Congress.  Remember this parents when you think of your children and whether or not they're safe and snug from Islamo-fascist terrorist monsters.  Democrats aren't just indifferent to national security, they despise national security and everything it stands for.  It's almost as if they want death and destruction so that somewhere in the bowels of their sick little minds we'll turn to them to save us from the evil Republicans who are attempting to enforce totalitarian rule across the land. 
 
Who cares if people die and terrorists flourish around the world.  Who cares if a few more skyscrapers go down in flames with thousands of innocent people inside.  Who cares if regular civilians minding their own business as passengers on an airplane have to all of a sudden become soldiers for their country and die in the process.  Who cares if Islam infiltrates the country and plots against us in the most horrible ways imaginable.  Not the Democrats, that's for sure; and certainly not Ted Kennedy.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Islam: The Religion of Hate and Death, The Religion of Submission

From Robert Spencer's Jihad Watch:
 
Al-Rashudi.jpg

Plan for genocide. Note also: he says that 50-60 people died in the Holocaust. Al-Rashudi hopes it will be more next time.

"Saudi Scholar Dr. Walid Al-Rashudi: 50-60 People Perished in Jewish Holocaust. The Killing of All the Jews Will Not Be Satisfactory Compensation for the "Real Holocaust" in Gaza," from MEMRITV (thanks to Barbara):

Following are excerpts from a speech delivered by Dr. Walid Al-Rashudi, head of the Department of Islamic Studies at King Saud University, Saudi Arabia, which aired on Al-Aqsa TV on February 29, 2008.

Walid Al-Rashudi: One of the important things that we must tell people is that what is going on in Palestine today is a real holocaust. This is the real holocaust. A holocaust is not the burning of 50-60 Jews in Germany or Switzerland, but the Jews continue to call it the Holocaust. In case you don't know, let me tell you that more than 90% of the Muslims in the world do not know that the Jews receive reparations from Germany and Switzerland for the so-called Holocaust affair. We believe that there was indeed a holocaust, but how many died? 50-60 people? Afterwards, they used it to blackmail these two countries.

So what are we supposed to say in the face of the Gaza holocaust? What compensation will satisfy us? By Allah, we will not be satisfied even if all the Jews are killed.


 
And that's not all folks!  More from the Religion of Hate and Death below:
 
Another damaging admission that will go unnoticed

Just last week I spoke at Hofstra University; in the crowd was a group of young Muslim men who politely asked me about the Israeli killing of civilians. I responded by noting that Hamas and Hizballah often staged attacks from civilian areas in order to use retaliatory fire for propaganda purposes. Here is further confirmation.

"Hamas MP Fathi Hammad: We Used Women and Children as Human Shields," from MEMRITV (thanks to Sr. Soph):

Following are excerpts from a speech delivered by Hamas MP Fathi Hammad, which aired on Al-Aqsa TV on February 29, 2008.

Fathi Hammad: [The enemies of Allah] do not know that the Palestinian people has developed its [methods] of death and death-seeking. For the Palestinian people, death has become an industry, at which women excel, and so do all the people living on this land. The elderly excel at this, and so do the mujahideen and the children. This is why they have formed human shields of the women, the children, the elderly, and the mujahideen, in order to challenge the Zionist bombing machine. It is as if they were saying to the Zionist enemy: "We desire death like you desire life."

"Say (O Muhammad): O ye who are Jews! If ye claim that ye are favoured of Allah apart from (all) mankind, then long for death if ye are truthful" -- Qur'an 62:6
 

Thank God for Robert Spencer and anyone else who is brave enough to expose what Islam has in-store for Israel and the world.  If I didn't hate our enemies so much I would actually pity them.  However, they deserve not one tear, not one drop of pity.  What they deserve is to be sent to their fake god Allah as soon as humanly possible.  These animals are evil.  Good cannot exist along side the monsters of Islam.  The fascist armies that surround Israel have every intention of carrying-out their proudly espoused promises.  Are we really going to sit by and watch it happen?  Are we to do nothing while our allies of the Lord our God are slaughtered?  Tell your friends and families what is happening.  Tell your Congressmen.  Demand action.  Demand we keep our word and uphold our treaties.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Jihad Islami Fires 26 Qassam Missiles from Gaza After Losing Two West Bank Chiefs

Several missiles landed in Sderot causing damage. No immediate reports of casualties. 

The salvoes from Wednesday night, March 12 to Thursday midday, came after five senior Palestinian terror commanders were killed in clashes with Israeli forces.

The long-wanted Bethlehem chief Mohammed Shehadeh was killed, along with Imad Kemal, Issa Marzoura and Fatah-al Aqsa Brigades operative Ahmed Balful, by an undercover Israeli force in Bethlehem Wednesday. They were sought for years for orchestrating major mass-murder attacks in Israel between 2001and 2004.

In an earlier encounter, in another part of the West Bank, an Israeli force killed the Jihad Islami’s Tulkarm commander.

DEBKAfile adds: Israel security forces expected Jihad Islami to retaliate with missile fire from Gaza – not just in revenge, but to underline the Hamas-Jihad demand in ongoing ceasefire negotiations for any truce agreed for Gaza to apply to the West Bank as well. Israel refuses to let its hands be tied in its long and effective counter-terror campaign on the West Bank.

Israel’s national high terror alert remains in place. It was imposed seven days ago after 8 students were murdered by a Palestinian gunman at the Jerusalem Mercaz Harav yeshiva in Jerusalem. Jewish congregations mark the seventh day of their deaths, March 13, with memorial services in Israel and overseas.
 
 
 
The Palestinian commitment to an "unofficial" cease-fire is as solid as ever!  This is the Palestinian way; lies instead of peace.  It's what they do.  Why can't people understand that?  It doesn't matter what the Palestinians say, it's the rocket fire that counts.  The Palestinian monsters will never stop attacking Israel until they are assaulted to the point they no longer have the ability to do harm.  The Western world, through its shackling of Israel, will destroy the Jews by not holding Palestine physically accountable for the terror it inflicts.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's Pastor: God Damn America, U.S. to Blame for 9/11

 
The Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Obama's pastor for the last 20 years at the Trinity United Church of Christ on Chicago's south side, has a long history of what even Obama's campaign aides concede is "inflammatory rhetoric," including the assertion that the United States brought on the 9/11 attacks with its own "terrorism."

In a campaign appearance earlier this month, Sen. Obama said, "I don't think my church is actually particularly controversial." He said Rev. Wright "is like an old uncle who says things I don't always agree with," telling a Jewish group that everyone has someone like that in their family.

Rev. Wright married Obama and his wife Michelle, baptized their two daughters and is credited by Obama for the title of his book, "The Audacity of Hope."

An ABC News review of dozens of Rev. Wright's sermons, offered for sale by the church, found repeated denunciations of the U.S. based on what he described as his reading of the Gospels and the treatment of black Americans.

"The government gives them the drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes a three-strike law and then wants us to sing 'God Bless America.' No, no, no, God damn America, that's in the Bible for killing innocent people," he said in a 2003 sermon. "God damn America for treating our citizens as less than human. God damn America for as long as she acts like she is God and she is supreme."

In addition to damning America, he told his congregation on the Sunday after Sept. 11, 2001 that the United States had brought on al Qaeda's attacks because of its own terrorism.

"We bombed Hiroshima, we bombed Nagasaki, and we nuked far more than the thousands in New York and the Pentagon, and we never batted an eye," Rev. Wright said in a sermon on Sept. 16, 2001.

"We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans, and now we are indignant because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought right back to our own front yards. America's chickens are coming home to roost," he told his congregation.


 
 
God damn America?  No, God damn Reverand Jeremiah Wright for hating America and being a racist old fool.  For twenty years B. Hussein Obama and his lovely wife have been soaking-up Wright's hatred and racist rhetoric.  This so-called reverand even married them into the bonds of Holy America-hating racism and bigotry.  B. Hussein Obama is proud of his anti-American church so much so that he's spent two decades of his life faithfully attending and praising a god of hate.  B. Hussein Obama has been indoctrinated into this ideology and brainwashed with the ravings of a madman.

Men like Reverand Wright are no better than the fascists we defeated in Germany and Japan.  He defends our enemies in WWII while laughing at those Americans who were murdered by Islam on 9/11.  B. Hussein Obama's church is disgusting.  The Democrat Party is about to nominate this 5th columnist to be our President!  That should tell you everything you need to know about the party of B. Hussein Obama and what they truly have in-store for our country.  The hatred and bigotry in B. Hussein Obama's soul makes Hillary Clinton look like Ronald Reagan for Christ's sake!  Open your eyes Democrat voters and recognize what is right in front of your face.  You cannot possibly allow this sick man with a twisted soul to gain control of the Executive Branch and spread his lunacy across the country.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Shiite Militia Serves Up Fingers of Kidnapping Victims to U.S. Officials in Iraq

MIAMI — A senior U.S. official confirmed to FOX News that the severed fingers of five Western hostages were delivered to U.S. government officials in Iraq, giving the men's relatives hope that they are still alive.

The Austrian weekly magazine News first reported the delivery of the five fingers in Wednesday's edition, citing unidentified authorities working on the case.

One of the kidnap victims in Iraq was a University of Florida student. The hostages have been missing for more than a year and U.S. authorities in Baghdad recently were sent their severed fingers.

Four of the men had been working as contractors when they were captured in a brazen ambush of their 43-truck supply convoy on Nov. 16, 2006.

The men were working for Crescent Security Group, a Kuwait-based private security company. They were kidnapped by men in Iraqi police uniforms who ambushed the convoy they were escorting near the southern city of Safwan.

Patrick Reuben, a Minneapolis police officer whose twin brother, Paul Reuben, is among the missing, said late Wednesday the FBI told his family that "the fingers were confirmed to be those of the hostages."

Patrick Reuben told The Associated Press the news of the severed fingers was "shocking" but that the initial word the family got was "much more serious than that. Later on we found that it was fingers that were recovered and that the DNA confirmed it was the hostages."

FBI spokesman Richard Kolko said the agency continues to investigate the whereabouts of the five men missing since 2006, as well as a sixth man, Ronald Withrow, an American who was kidnapped separately from the others and whose finger apparently was among those sent to officials.

"The investigation continues into the whereabouts and safety of the five men kidnapped in Iraq," Kolko said. "The FBI has received DNA evidence and is conducting an examination. Additionally, the FBI's Office of Victim Assistance has been working with the U.S. families involved in this matter."

Kolko continued: "They have been kept up to date on information the FBI had available and were notified of the DNA samples in February. We understand this is a very difficult time for the families and discussing this matter further in the media is not appropriate."

The men were abducted in two separate incidents that occurred a month and a half apart more than two years ago, a U.S. government official said Thursday in Washington.

The six missing are Reuben, a former St. Louis Park, Minn., police officer; Joshua Munns of Redding, Calif.; John Young of Kansas City, whose finger was not among those sent to officials; Jonathon Cote of the Buffalo, N.Y., area; Bert Nussbaumer of Austria; and Withrow, 40, of Lubbock, Texas, a contractor working for JPI Worldwide who was abducted on Jan. 5, 2007, near Basra.

Reuben said his family is "certainly hopeful, but there's nothing definite right now."

State Department spokesman Sean McCormack declined Thursday to comment on the matter except to say: "We continue to demand these hostages' immediate release so that they can be returned safely to their families."


 
Al-Qaeda is hardly the only problem in Iraq.  While al-Qaeda operations have been nearly crushed by our military, illegal Shiite militias continue to inflict terror upon Westerners in the country who traveled to Iraq only to help.  Follow the link above for the whole story.  The families of the victims are low on patience at this point.  I would be too when all I got were words instead of action.  At least the severed fingers indicate the hostages are still alive.  A glimmer of hope through mutiliation.  That's Islamo-fascist extremism for you.  Pray for the hostages and their families as I do.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Raul Castro Frees Cuba!

HAVANA (Reuters) - Communist Cuba has authorized the sale of computers, DVD and video players and other electrical appliances in the first sign President Raul Castro is moving to lift some restrictions on daily life.

"Based on the improved availability of electricity the government at the highest level has approved the sale of some equipment which was prohibited," said an internal government memo seen by Reuters.

It listed computers, video and DVD players, 19-inch and 24-inch television sets, electric pressure cookers and rice cookers, electric bicycles, car alarms and microwaves that can now be freely bought by Cubans.

 
See how wrong everyone was?  Raul Castro is the wave of change in Cuba we've all been waiting for!  While he will still torture the people of Cuba until they die, Cubans can now buy DVD players, computers, and television sets.  Oh glorious day!  Long live the revolution!  I always knew Raul would be a moderate.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Want to Read About Real Evil? Liberian President Charles Taylor Ordered Cannibalism on the Battlefield

AMSTERDAM, Netherlands (AP) -- Grim tales of cannibalism highlighting the brutality of West Africa's civil wars emerged in testimony Thursday at the war crimes trial of former Liberian President Charles Taylor.
 
Joseph "Zigzag" Marzah, who described himself as Taylor's chief of operations and head of the death squad before Taylor became president, said African peacekeepers and even United Nations personnel were killed and eaten on the battlefield by Taylor's militiamen.

Prosecutors described Marzah as a key witness with inside knowledge of the former Liberian president's operations in Liberia and neighboring Sierra Leone, where he is accused of responsibility for the widespread murder, rape and amputations committed by soldiers loyal to him.

Taylor, 59, has pleaded not guilty to 11 counts of war crimes and crimes against humanity. He is accused of orchestrating violence in Sierra Leone's civil war, which ended in 2002, and trading in illegally mined diamonds to finance the conflict.

The trial by the Special Court for Sierra Leone, part of the International Criminal Court in The Hague, Netherlands, began last June but adjourned after one day when Taylor fired his lawyer. It reconvened in January, but many prosecution witnesses have testified behind closed doors for fear of retribution.

Marzah appeared in open court after lengthy negotiations involving protection for him and his family.

Prodded under cross-examination by defense lawyer Courtenay Griffith, Marzah gave a sometimes-graphic description of cannibalism that altered between the ritual taking of vengeance and the practical need for food.

He repeatedly said nothing was done without Taylor's instructions, and that anyone who violated Taylor's orders would be executed.

"Did Charles Taylor order you to eat people?" Griffith asked.

"Yes, to set an example for the people to be afraid," Marzah replied.

He appeared unfazed by Griffith's blunt queries, and responded in matter-of-fact tones to such questions as "How do you prepare a human being for the pot?"

Marzah then described the splitting, cleaning, decapitating and cooking of the corpse with salt and pepper. "We throw your head away," he said.

He said the victims were usually from the ethnic Krahn, the tribe of former Liberian President Samuel Doe whom Taylor set out to topple in 1989. But they also included peacekeepers from the Nigerian-led ECOMOG, the African peacekeeping force sent to the area in 1990, and some U.N. people, he said.

"How many ECOMOG soldiers did you eat?" the attorney asked.

"We ate a few but not many. But many were executed, about 68," the witness said, and several U.N. personnel also were captured. The time and location of the incident were unclear.

"Which ones taste best?" Griffith asked.

"There was no alternative but to do it your own way," Marzah replied.

Enemies, he was told, "are no longer human beings."

Taylor, then head of the National Patriotic Liberian Front, said in interviews at the time that he considered ECOMOG to be just another warring faction in the multisided civil wars in Sierra Leone and Liberia.

Later, ECOMOG helped stabilize the region, allowing elections in Liberia in 1997 that Taylor won.

 
 
Crimes against humanity indeed.  An exceptionally horrifying report coming out of the trial of Liberian President Charles Taylor.  This article truly sent spasms up my spine and the back of my neck when I first read it today.  It does not conjure up pretty images in the mind, that's for sure.  Charles Taylor is the very definition of inhuman.  The Devil himself resided in Liberia during the wretched acts described in this article.  Standing-up to and defeating evil is the best thing any group of people can do whether they be part of some sort of organization, religion, or an entire country.  The reason you are put on this Earth, the meaning of life, is to do good.  Anything else you do is secondary at best.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

American Teens' Taught to be Stupid by Our Liberal Public Schoolteachers

It was like opening the New York Times on a Wednesday morning in February 2008 and seeing the headline “Lindbergh Baby Kidnapped” or “Hitler Marches Into Rhineland.” Like the movie “Groundhog Day,” where the same thing keeps happening over and over. Definitely déjà vu, as actress/author Simone Signoret put it, all over again.

The headline in question: “Survey Finds Teenagers Ignorant on Basic History and Literature Questions.” And this time around it’s not farce, it’s still tragedy. Because the same headlines announcing the same deplorable facts appeared 25 years ago, and nothing seems to have changed in the intervening years. Yes, there have been many kinds of changes in the schools since the mid-1980s, but improvement in what really counts – what young Americans know about their country and their world – is not among them.

Anxiety about the state of schooling in America was launched in 1957 with Sputnik, the USSR satellite program that served to warn that the U.S. was falling behind in the technology race. Finally, in 1983, a blue-ribbon commission was created by the Reagan administration to investigate the question of what had been happening to America’s schools. The result was a brilliant report titled “A Nation At Risk,” which declared, “Our once unchallenged preeminence in commerce, industry, science, and technological innovation is being overtaken by competitors throughout the world” and identified the dimension of the problem “that undergirds American prosperity, security, and civility…. the educational foundations of our society are presently being eroded by a rising tide of mediocrity that threatens our very future as a Nation and a people…. If an unfriendly foreign power had attempted to impose on America the mediocre educational performance that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war.

As it stands, we have allowed this to happen to ourselves. We have even squandered the gains in student achievement made in the wake of the Sputnik challenge….We have, in effect, been committing an act of unthinking, unilateral educational disarmament. Our society and its educational institutions seem to have lost sight of the basic purposes of schooling, and of the high expectations and disciplined effort needed to attain them.”

A gauntlet had been thrown down before the educational establishment, and plans for reform seemed to come from all directions. But before settling on the diagnosis and cure, the symptoms have to be identified. This was the purpose of a ground-breaking book by education historian Diane Ravitch and policy expert Chester E. Finn, Jr., titled “What Do Our 17-Year-Olds Know: A Report on the First National Assessment of History and Literature.”

Analyzing the results of a test administered to a sample of high-school juniors of different races, sexes, income levels and geographic regions, Ravitch and Finn revealed some shocking numbers. Little more than half could answer the questions on literature or history. Only 20% could identify Joyce or Dostoevsky, fewer than 25% could identify Henry James or Thomas Hardy, only one in three knew Chaucer was the author of The Canterbury Tales, 65% did not know what 1984 or Lord of the Flies is about.

It gets worse. One third of these American high school students could not identify the phrase “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” as coming from the Declaration of Independence and even those who identified the phrase correctly could not articulate the document’s significance; some who found the phrase familiar thought it came from the Gettysburg Address.

Three quarters of the students did not know when Abraham Lincoln was president; three of every ten could not place the Civil War in the proper half-century. More than a third could not place the writing of the Constitution in the proper half-century. Map questions revealed only the most elementary knowledge of American or European geography; many girls, black and Hispanic students had trouble locating Great Britain. For the most part what information or misinformation students had about world events and great works of literature seem to come from movies and television rather than from school.

Fast forward to last week’s New York Times article. Twenty-five years after the wake-up call of “A Nation at Risk,” twenty years after the depressing answer to “What Do Our Seventeen-Year Olds Know,” the news in 2008 is that our schools still aren’t doing their job and that our high school students remain ignorant of basic U.S. and world history and literature. The familiar story reported by the Times: Fewer than half of today’s American teenagers today asked questions from the 1986 survey knew when the Civil War was fought, and one in four said Columbus sailed to the New World “some time after 1750.” (The Times adds to the last sentence “not in 1492,” in case some of its readers might not know the date either. After all, they are products of America’s schools.)

Other results were equally appalling when one considers that these are the citizens who will choose the next generation of the country’s leaders – and who might even be among those leaders themselves. About a quarter of today’s high school juniors were unable to identify Hitler as Germany’s leader in World War II. The rest guessed he was a munitions maker, an Austrian premier or the German Kaiser. Roughly half knew Job as the Biblical figure embodying patience in the face of suffering. The other half thought he might have been a builder, a warrior or a prophet. While the past and its great works remain a mystery to most American teenagers, what they do know illustrates the emphasis on race in today’s curriculum. Although uncertain about Abraham Lincoln, most were familiar with Martin Luther King, Jr. and knew the plot of To Kill a Mockingbird.
 
 
Read Part II and III by Rita Kramer at the link above.  The downright hideous Communist rule of our public schools is producing the dumbest generation ever to one-day govern our country.  It's embarrassing to read this article.  This is what you get when we allow liberal-Commie-fascists to run our schools and universities.  This is not the worst education; it's no education at all!  The anti-education of our teenagers drills MLK into their heads but doesn't teach them the importance of Abrahm Lincoln.  Know why?  Lincoln was a Republican.  How on Earth could teaching teenagers that Republican freed the slaves while Democrats gave their lives to keep them in bondage do any good for liberals?  Destroying history is the name of the game in our public schools.  Churning out brainwashed graduates all the more ready to be dominated by Communist college professors is the goal.
 
Ann Coulter on Democrats educating our children:  Stalin said, "Give me your children and in 50 years I'll control the state."  Hitler said, "Give me your textbooks and in 50 years I'll control the state."  Democrats said, "Give me control of your public schools and in 50 years no one will know how to read."
 
Lovely.  We're living it folks.  Don't believe me?  Go ask the first teenager you can find about any aspect of relevant history and see what they tell you.  Their minds are filled with pop-culture and sex because that is exactly how the Democrats and their Communist slave-masters want it.  You can be anything you want kids, as long as you don't grow up to be a responsible and good American.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Article 51

Article 51 of the United Nations Charter guarantees its members “the inherent right to…individual self defense” against “an armed attack.” In January of 2006, Hamas was elected to govern the Palestinian Authority. After Israel ended its occupation of Gaza and removed all of its settlers, Hamas threw the Palestinian Authority out of the Gaza and assumed de facto as well as de jure control over the entire Gaza Strip. Its leaders then instructed its military wing to direct rockets at civilian targets in southern Israel. At first these rockets were Qassams with a relatively short range. Now they include Katyushas, which can reach to Israel’s large cities, including Ashkelon, with its population of 120,000 civilians. Hamas has officially declared that its policy is to develop or smuggle even longer range missiles capable of reaching Israel’s largest city Tel Aviv and its lifeblood, Ben Gurion Airport. It has promised to keep aiming its missiles at civilian targets until the Jewish state is finally destroyed.

If this is not an “armed attack” under Article 51, then I don’t know what is. The only argument against it being an armed attack is that rocketing civilian population centers, as Hamas is doing, is a war-crime. International law prohibits, even during a declared war, the deliberate targeting of civilians or the bombing of areas of civilian population centers with absolutely no military significance. But war-crimes may also constitute an armed attack: Hitler’s invasion of Poland was both, as the Nuremberg Tribunal determined. If anything, an armed attack that is also a war crime justifies the right of self defense even more than a mere armed attack.

Nor can it be said that these attacks on Israeli towns and cities are merely the work of individual terrorists or terrorist groups. The military wing of Hamas is in fact a terrorist organization, as the Untied States and the European Community have recognized. But since Hamas is in political and military control of the liberated Gaza Strip, the military wing of Hamas is also the official army of that government, as Hamas itself has proclaimed.

What then are Israel’s rights under international law, under the law of war, under historical precedents and under various treaties and human rights concepts? What have, and what would, other nations whose cities and towns were attacked by enemy rockets do? Israel certainly has the right to counterattack its enemy, destroy its capacity to fire rockets and engage in “belligerent reprisal.” The only constraint on Israeli action is “proportionality.” Israel’s military actions must be proportional. But proportional to what? Certainly not to the actual number of people who have thus far been killed or injured by rocket attacks. Israel has spent an enormous amount of money building shelters to protect against rockets. Close to a thousand rockets have been aimed at southern Israel in recent years. Each one of them had the capacity to kill dozens, if not hundreds of civilians. The fact that no Hamas rocket has yet hit a school bus, a kindergarten, an ambulance, a synagogue, or a school yard is simply happenstance. It is only a matter of time until this happens. No nation has to wait until the goals of its enemy are fulfilled before it engages in a proportional response. Proportion must be defined by reference to the threat posed by the enemy and not by the harm it has produced. No nation need allow its enemies to play Russian Roulette with its children.

 
 
Alan Dershowitz, the author of the article excerpted above, is correct in his assertions of Article 51 and Israel's availability of appropriate actions under the article.  He's also correct about the fact there's no constructive criticism or suggestion about what Israel should do to defend its people.  According to the UN, Israel has an obvious right to defend itself in the war declared on it by Hamas and the Palestinians.  The world constantly tells Israel what it must not do, but never gives a clue as to what would be tolerable in the face of hundreds of missile attacks upon its civilians. 
 
Apparently Israel is to sit and do nothing while, as Mr. Dershowitz states, it allows its "enemies to play Russian Roulette with is children."  If just one of our cities here in America were under rocket attack from across the border (forgetting the chaos on the U.S.-Mexico border for a second) those civilians would be marching on Washington demanding a quick and final halt to those attacks by whatever means necessary.  Can you imagine what the people of Miami would do if Cuba was lobbing rockets into schools and public parks on a daily basis, or at all?  Do you have any idea what the military's response would be regardless of Democrats controlling Congress?  George Bush would utterly destroy Cuba's ability to fire missiles ever again.  Of that I can be pretty damn sure. 
 
What does the government of Israel do to Palestine?  I can assure you they're no better than the United Nations itself.  The Knesset is run by the UN and other assorted liberal idiots who have only one thing on their minds; retaining power.  It doesn't matter how many Jews die or how many missiles are launced at their people.  Playing politics with lives is the best they will do under any circumstance it seems.  Israel will receive no constructive criticism from the nations of the UN or from Condi Rice.  No one is going to tell them they can fire back and defend themselves.  The Palestinian terrorists must be protected at all costs, even at the cost of dead Jews and the fall of Israel.
 
If Israel won't defend itself then no one else will.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"What I Did on My Vacation: Nothing – by Nancy Pelosi" by Pam Meister

In August of 2007, the Protect America Act (PAA) was signed into law after passing high majority votes in both the House and Senate. What exactly did the PAA do? It allowed the government to monitor phone calls and e-mails originating overseas to (or from) a person suspected of having ties to terror organizations and/or al Qaeda for up to one year without a warrant. The PAA included a 180 day sunset provision.

Then, in January of this year, President Bush signed a 15-day extension of the PAA as requested by Congress – presumably so that Congress could get its act together and vote to make the PAA provisions permanent. After all, why wouldn’t we want to know what potential terrorists are planning and plotting against us? Forewarned is forearmed and all that stuff.

The Senate was up to the task, as they voted to pass the FISA Amendments Act of 2007, which covered most of the provisions of the PAA indefinitely, as well as providing immunity for telecommunications companies that complied with government requests to assist the National Security Agency in monitoring calls and e-mail communications as per an executive order from President Bush after 9/11.

Unfortunately, the House – led by Supergrandma Nancy Pelosi – was not up to the challenge. Pelosi, in her infinite wisdom, decided to call a 12-day vacation for her minions without bothering to vote on the FISA Amendments Act passed by the Senate just two days earlier. And two days after the House adjourned, the PAA expired.

According to Jed Babbin of Human Events, Pelosi did all of this “despite a letter she received from most of the ‘Blue Dog’ Democrats telling her they’d vote for the Senate bill. Added to Republican numbers, the Blue Dogs’ votes would have enabled Pelosi to pass the bill on a simple majority vote.”

Nice going, Granny.

No matter which poll you look at, the job approval rating of Congress in general is in the toilet. (It’s lower than the president’s, but we won’t talk about that.) And a large percentage of Americans are annoyed with Pelosi’s decision to call a recess without dealing with FISA and, by extension, the PAA. According to a new survey by American Solutions, 71% of those Americans surveyed “find it unacceptable that the U.S. House went on a 12 day recess without renewing the Protect America Act -- legislation that permits the government to monitor the communications of suspected terrorists overseas.

The survey also shows that 74% of Americans believe that telecommunications companies who help the government track down terrorists should be granted immunity from lawsuits relating to their assistance.”

When you look at the breakdown of the survey, even a majority of Democrats polled disapprove of the vacation gambit. When your own party members aren’t backing you, perhaps it’s time to sit back and evaluate your strategy.

Back when she was installed as the first woman Speaker, Nancy Pelosi could do no wrong. Just over a year later, buyer’s remorse seems to be setting in. Specific criticism of Madame Speaker seems muted, however, perhaps because one wouldn’t want to sound sexist by talking smack about the first female House Speaker in American history. Such an image must be constantly buffed to keep that nasty tarnish away.

But that’s okay; since I’m also a woman, I’m not going to worry about being labeled as a sexist. Just think of me as one of the gals at the kaffee klatsch, not some mean ol’ guy who wants to beat up on a woman in charge.

When she accepted her gavel in January of 2007, Pelosi said:

"I accept this gavel in the spirit of partnership not partisanship, and look forward to working ... with you on behalf of the American people.

"In this House, we may belong to different parties, but we serve one country. We stand united in our pride and prayers for our men and women in uniform. They are working together to protect the American people, and we, in this Congress we must work together to build a future worthy of their sacrifice.”

What a difference a year makes. Instead of working together to build a future worthy of the sacrifice of our military men and women, she is, in effect, treating that sacrifice like a pesky fly that buzzes near the fruit salad at a summer picnic. But why? For those of you who are baffled as to why Pelosi would refuse this bill a chance to be voted on in the House, Jed Babbin has a good idea:

The best explanation for Pelosi’s refusal to pass the Senate bill through the House is the Democrats’ craving for political donations from the trial lawyers. As Sen. McConnell told me, “It’s more important to [the Democrats] for these companies to be in court, thereby enriching their plaintiff lawyer buddies, than for these terrorists to be in jail.”

I thought only the Republicans were slaves to lobby interests. Now I find that Democrats may be vulnerable to the same temptations? My world has stopped spinning.

 
 
Great work from Pam Meister writing at Family Security Matters.  As I say so very often; Family Security Matters should be required reading.  In actuality, it's not that Granny Nancy did nothing on her vacation; it's that she whored out herself and her party to lawyers like an expensive Spitzer hooker instead of protecting American citizens.  Democrats for America?  No, Democrats for Themselves!  In their twisted minds, America is only helped if Democrats are in control of the government.  Therefore the most important thing they can do is retain their power instead of defending the country because they can't defend the country if they aren't in power.  The only problem is, they never get to the "defending their country" part due to the fact the Democrats are always focused on retaining their power.  Granny Nancy and the rest of her party find themselves caught in this circular nonsense way too often for my taste.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Al-Qaeda in Iraq Under Saddam" by Jamie Glazov

 
Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Osama al-Magid, a former police officer in Iraq (1992- 2003). He can be contacted at osamaalmajid@yahoo.com.
 
FP: Osama al-Magid, welcome to Frontpage Interview.

Al-Magid: Thank you Mr. Glazov. I hope to provide information to the American public that will help them understand that terrorism in the U.S. from Al Qaeda did not end on September 11th, 2001. There are currently supporters of Al Qaeda not only outside of the U.S. but also inside of it.

This is my first interview pertaining to many of the issues I am going to discuss with you. Right now I can provide some details, but as time goes by I will be providing the Americans with more about the truth in Iraq. There have been friends of mine who have tried to inform the American people about things in Iraq before 2003 and after the Americans came to Iraq, but for some reasons the information has not been widely publicized. I will tell the American people that a person who is like a brother to me has risked his life to tell people about many important issues in Iraq. I met Special Agent Dave Gaubatz in 2003 (Nasiriyah). Dave and I started working together to obtain intelligence about threats against the U.S. forces. We traveled in Nasiriyah and other cities. We protected one another and today in 2008 we are still working together. I can’t explain everything right now for security reasons, but we are traveling through America and trying to identify terrorists and their supporters who want to attack America like in 2001. We are trying to help law enforcement so they can protect America.

Both of us have families and we do not want the children in America, Iraq, or any country to suffer from terrorism.

FP: Tell us about your experience as a police officer in Iraq. In what cities did you work? What happened after the American liberation?

Al-Magid: I attended the Iraq Police Academy in Baghdad for three years from 1992 - 1995. I was then assigned to Nasiriyah and Basra. Of course as a police officer I traveled and worked in many cities throughout Iraq. I attained the rank of Captain. I was trained in all areas of criminal investigations. I worked robbery and murder cases. Americans must understand that under Saddam Hussein the members of the Baath Party and other "privileged people" living in Iraq could commit major crimes like murder and rape and receive protection. As police officers we could only investigate people we were allowed by Saddam to investigate.

My family and I were very happy when we realized the Americans were coming to Iraq. Although many Iraqi people were happy the Americans were coming to remove Saddam Hussein, they were not allowed to show it. Some did and they were killed by the Fedeyeen for doing so. One example was a young girl on the roof of her house and she saw the American helicopters in Nasiriyah. She started waving to the Americans. Some of her Baath party neighbors saw her waving. They reported this to the officials. The Fedeyeen came and killed her mother and father in front of her. Being a police officer and knowing they had committed crimes did not mean I or any officer could arrest them. The Fedeyeen were under the protection of Saddam.

After the Americans came to Iraq, it did not become peaceful. There were many people still in all cities who supported Saddam Hussein. From March 2003 until the fall of 2003, many supporters of Saddam were simply regrouping and preparing for attacks against the Americans.

FP: How about Al Qaeda in Iraq?

Al-Magid: Al Qaeda and other people who believed the same as Al Qaeda had been in Iraq for many years. When I say “believed” I mean people who hated America and wanted to destroy the U.S.

Saddam had this in common with Al Qaeda and this is why he provided them protection. My family and I had suffered under Saddam as many Iraqis did. Even as a police officer I had been put in jail and tortured because some people knew I did not like how Saddam treated his own people. Many members of my family had also been tortured, but luckily we had enough money to pay the Baath Party in order to get them out of jail.

FP: So how did Dave Gaubatz come into the picture?

Al-Magid: Around 2003, as I have mentioned, I met Mr. Gaubatz. My family and I wanted to help the Americans and we went to a base to speak with someone who could work with us. Dave knew our family had already saved some American soldiers’ lives and we started working together. I can’t mention some things right now, but I can say we talked about Al Qaeda and the Iranians being in Iraq before 2003. Saddam used some of these groups to terrorize the Iraqi people so they would not go against him.

Dave, one other agent, and I traveled through different states to obtain some security information. We did not have security forces with us. In early 2003, the agents and I traveled by ourselves. It was very dangerous, but the information we obtained was very important.

Many people will want to know how I was able to come to the U.S. in late 2003. I can say that my family and I had provided the U.S. very important security information and we had saved many American soldiers lives. It was arranged through the U.S. Government for us to live in America. I believe it is very important for everyone in America to work together to protect America, because there are terrorists who want to destroy this country.

Both Dave Gaubatz and I know how dangerous Al Qaeda is. Dave is from America, I am from Iraq, he is a Christian, and I am a Muslim. We care for each other and our families care about each other. Al Qaeda does not care about any of us.

FP: Can you talk about Al Qaeda in Iraq before and after 2003?

Al-Magid: I have discussed some points about Al Qaeda being in Iraq for many years before 2003. This seems to only be a surprise to Americans, but everyone in Iraq knew Al Qaeda was being protected by Saddam in Iraq. The Al Qaeda people had their own mosques in Nasiriyah and only Al Qaeda could go to the mosques. One of their mosques was near the Saddam hospital that Private Jessica Lynch was being held as a prisoner.

Americans do not understand how much they helped the Iraqis when they removed Saddam.


Something that U.S. forces must understand in Iraq is that if they are speaking with someone they must be very careful. This person may be a good person, but maybe they know someone in their family who is Fedeyeen, senior Baath Party, or with Al Qaeda. One of my relatives was a senior Baath Party member, but I was not. My father was a good man and he did not want his children being unkind to anyone. He did not want us to support the Baath Party.

When my family and I helped the Americans in 2003, we knew it was very dangerous. Many Iraqis had been killed and still are for helping the Americans. Fedeyeen and Al Qaeda had tried to find us in Iraq. They had told our neighbors they would kill us. They burnt our home down. Dave Gaubatz was able to get us to safety and to the U.S. We knew they would not stop looking for us though. It was no secret to the Iraqi people that Al Qaeda and their supporters were living in America. The borders of America are open and there are people who come across the borders to enter the U.S. When I arrived in the U.S. in late 2003, it was not long before we began to be followed and then some Arabs came to our home once. U.S. Government security handled the situation for us.
 
 
 
But I thought there was no such thing as Al-Qaeda in Iraq before we evil Americans invaded to save the country's people from the most brutal dictator the world has seen in the past thirty years!  Boy was I wrong.  Al-Qaeda under Saddam?  Someone should tell the press!  Someone should alert the President!  Someone should tell the Democrats!  For crying out loud someone should tell Cindy Sheehan!!!  Damn we're stupid.
 
Al-Qaeda was there before and they are there now... well al-Qaeda is mostly destroyed in Iraq now thanks to our soldiers and General Petraeus' brilliant Surge tactic.  No WMD and no al-Qaeda.  Why doesn't anyone remember Zarqawi's flight froom Afghanistan into Iraq and Saddam's hospital after we wounded him?  Or Saddam attempting to buy yellow-cake uranium in Nigeria, a country I might add who's only export besides large amounts of sand happens to be uranium?  Anyone?  Pathetic.
 
With the facts right in our faces most of America refuses to see the obvious connections and understand the importance of removing Saddam Hussein before we spent the first decade fighting The Long War agains Islamo-fascism.  B. Hussein Obama sure as Hell doesn't get it, why should any other Democrat?  Even cranky old stubborn John McCain gets it for the sake of all that's Holy!  Wake-up people!  Anyone on the radio or on your TV that tells you al-Qaeda is simply a rag-tag band of angry idiots needs to be taken out and shot in the foot.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive